TaylorMade · Golf Equipment & Apparel
TaylorMade All Weather Golf Glove
All-weather gloves likely use water-repellent coating. TaylorMade silent on PFAS.
All-weather golf gloves typically employ water-repellent coating treatments, which historically used PFAS. TaylorMade provides no public disclosure of coating chemistry or PFAS status.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
synthetic leather with water-resistant treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
TaylorMade All Weather gloves use synthetic leather (typically polyurethane or PVC-based) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to maintain grip and water resistance during play. The water-repellent coating finish is the primary concern: such coatings historically rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve their water and oil-shedding properties, though some manufacturers have begun phasing to PFOS/PFOA-free alternatives. The synthetic leather backing and any adhesives are secondary chemical exposure points, though at lower risk than the surface treatment.
The brand's record and disclosure
TaylorMade has not publicly disclosed PFAS use, sources, or phase-out commitments for any apparel products, including gloves. The company has no widely documented certifications (Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, etc.) that would signal chemical transparency. No major safety recalls or chemical safety controversies are on record for this product line, but silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is typical across golf equipment brands and reflects industry-wide lack of consumer disclosure on performance coatings.
How it compares in its category
All-weather golf gloves across brands rely on water-repellent coating treatments, making PFAS exposure a category-wide issue, not unique to TaylorMade. Premium brands (Titleist, Callaway, FootJoy) follow the same coating practices with similar lack of transparency. Non-waterproof wool or leather golf gloves avoid water-repellent coating chemistry entirely but sacrifice the all-weather function; this product sits in the performance-first segment where chemical trade-offs are routine and largely unregulated.
If you buy it
Wash gloves by hand in cool water with mild soap; avoid machine washing and hot water, which can degrade synthetic leather and accelerate coating breakdown, potentially releasing microparticles. Replace gloves when grip diminishes or seams separate (typically 1-2 seasons of regular use). Store in a cool, dry place; prolonged sun exposure accelerates UV degradation of both the synthetic material and coating. Hand-washing also extends the water-repellent coating finish lifespan and reduces the need for frequent replacement, lowering cumulative chemical exposure.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
PFAS in water-repellent coating
Water-resistant golf gloves almost universally use fluorinated water-repellent coating treatments. TaylorMade has not disclosed whether their formula is legacy PFOS/PFOA or newer alternatives; assume PFAS present unless independently verified otherwise.
Synthetic leather degradation and microfiber shedding
Polyurethane and PVC synthetic leather break down over time and with repeated washing, shedding microfibers. Contact with skin during extended wear is unavoidable; long-term health significance remains under study but is a recognized concern in textiles.
Azo dyes in synthetic leather
No specific safety issues on record for TaylorMade gloves, but synthetic leather is typically dyed using azo chemistry. TaylorMade does not disclose dye sources or test results; azo dyes are regulated in some markets but not universally banned and can release aromatic amines under certain conditions.
Adhesive off-gassing or skin contact irritation
Synthetic leather gloves use polyurethane adhesives to bond layers. No documented irritation cases exist for this product, but adhesive volatiles and skin sensitivity remain possible in individuals with chemical sensitivities, particularly in warm or sweaty conditions.
Formaldehyde resins in finish
Some water-resistant textile finishes incorporate formaldehyde-based resins for durability. TaylorMade provides no disclosure; formaldehyde in finished textiles is regulated in the EU but less strictly in North America. Direct skin exposure risk is low but cumulative with other sources.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 55% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel
Cobra
Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove
Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching
Golf glove, low PFAS risk.
⚠Risky category by default
Honma
Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl
Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing
Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.
⚠Risky category by default
Honma
Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit
Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips
Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf equipment & apparel grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.