20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
FootJoy WeatherSof Golf Glove 2 Pack

FootJoy · Golf Equipment & Apparel

FootJoy WeatherSof Golf Glove 2 Pack

F · High PFAS

Golf glove with water-resistant treatment; PFAS status undisclosed by brand.

Verdict: SkipLeather palm glove with undisclosed water-resistant finish; PFAS likely present but unconfirmed. Monitor for skin irritation; acceptable with caution.

WeatherSof gloves use water-repellent coating treatment for water resistance, a common application for PFAS coatings. FootJoy has not publicly disclosed PFAS use or absence in this product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather palm with synthetic/treated back

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

FootJoy WeatherSof combines a leather palm (typically cow leather) with a synthetic back, likely polyester or nylon. The 'WeatherSof' branding indicates a water-resistant treatment applied to the synthetic portions. Water repellency in golf gloves is typically achieved through fluorochemical finishes (PFAS-based) or wax/silicone coatings. FootJoy has not publicly disclosed which technology is used here, making the exact hazard profile unclear.

The brand's record and disclosure

FootJoy (owned by Acushnet Holdings) has not published a comprehensive PFAS elimination policy or transparency report regarding their glove lines. The brand does not list chemical certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign) for this product on publicly available materials. This silence on water-resistant treatment chemistry is typical across the golf equipment industry but represents a disclosure gap for consumers seeking safer alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves in this price tier typically use fluorochemical water-resistant treatments without disclosure. Premium brands like Titleist and lower-cost alternatives show similar opacity on PFAS use. Gloves explicitly marketed as PFAS-free or certified organic are rare in golf equipment. FootJoy's market position offers no transparency advantage over competitors.

If you buy it

Wash the glove by hand in cool water before first use to remove surface finishes and any processing residue. Avoid machine washing or exposure to high heat, which can degrade both leather and synthetic coatings. Replace the glove every 12-18 months of regular use or when the palm shows visible wear; degraded coating is more likely to shed fibers. Store dry between uses to prevent mold and bacterial growth in the fabric.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

Water-resistant chemical finish (fluorochemical PFAS likelihood)

WeatherSof designation strongly suggests fluorochemical treatment. FootJoy has not disclosed the specific finish chemistry. PFAS are standard in golf glove water-repellency; absence of a PFAS-free claim indicates probable presence.

Possible

Formaldehyde in synthetic back or dyes

Synthetic fabrics and leather dyeing can involve formaldehyde-releasing resins. No OEKO-TEX or similar certification listed for this product. Risk is moderate for a glove with limited skin contact area and outdoor use.

Possible

Azo dyes in leather or synthetic coloring

Leather palm and synthetic backing may use azo dyes, which can break down to release aromatic amines under sweat and UV exposure. Not a primary hazard in golf gloves due to limited contact duration, but not ruled out.

Reported

Coating degradation and microfiber shedding

Water-resistant finishes on synthetic fabrics degrade with washing and friction. Shedding of microfibers from the back panel has been documented in similar glove designs. Risk increases with machine washing or aggressive handling.

Possible

Skin sensitization from uncured tanning agents or dyes

Leather palms may retain residual chromium or plant tannins if not fully cured. Some users report mild contact dermatitis with new leather gloves. Prewashing and air-drying before use reduces this risk.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel

Cobra Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Cobra

Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Golf glove, low PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated4 flags

Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.

Risky category by default

More golf equipment & apparel grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.