20/ 100
F
OverallF8/100
FootJoy WeatherSof Golf Glove

FootJoy · Golf Equipment & Apparel

FootJoy WeatherSof Golf Glove

F · High PFAS

Golf glove with water-repellent coating; FootJoy does not disclose PFAS status.

Verdict: SkipLeather golf glove with undisclosed water-repellent coating treatment; no major hazards reported, but PFAS uncertainty and lack of brand transparency warrant cautious purchase with attention to care.

FootJoy WeatherSof uses water-resistant leather treatment typical of golf gloves, likely containing PFAS-based water-repellent coating. No public disclosure or third-party certification available to confirm safer alternatives.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

FootJoy WeatherSof gloves are constructed from leather (likely sheepskin or goat leather common to golf gloves) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. The water-repellent coating is the primary concern: traditional water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on fluorinated compounds (PFAS), though some manufacturers have begun transitioning to fluorine-free alternatives. Leather itself is generally stable and does not leach hazardous chemicals under normal wear, but the surface treatment composition remains the unknown variable here.

The brand's record and disclosure

FootJoy (owned by Acushnet Holdings) does not publicly disclose the chemical composition of its water-repellent coating treatments or provide certification for PFAS-free status on this product line. The brand has not published a formal PFAS elimination commitment as of available public records, and no independent testing results for this specific glove model are documented. This silence on chemical inputs is typical of many sporting goods manufacturers but represents a gap in transparency that consumers seeking lower-PFAS alternatives should note.

How it compares in its category

Most premium golf gloves use synthetic leather or treated natural leather with water-repellent coatings; FootJoy WeatherSof positions itself in the mid-to-premium segment. Competitors like Titleist and Callaway use similar water-repellent coating-treated materials without public disclosure either, making this glove representative of industry practice rather than an outlier. Genuinely PFAS-free golf gloves are rare and typically marketed explicitly; the absence of that claim here suggests conventional formulation, though without testing certainty is impossible.

If you buy it

Wash this glove with mild soap and cool water rather than machine washing to preserve the water-repellent coating and avoid unnecessary chemical leaching. Air-dry flat away from direct heat or sunlight, which can degrade both leather and surface treatments. Replace the glove when the grip surface shows significant wear or water no longer beads on the palm side. Store in a cool, dry place; mold growth on leather requires gentle brushing and air circulation rather than chemical treatment.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fluorinated water-repellent coating (PFAS)

Water-repellent finish is typical on golf gloves; FootJoy has not disclosed whether this uses fluorinated (PFAS) or fluorine-free chemistry. No independent testing of this model is on record. Skin contact with treated leather during normal wear poses minimal acute risk, but manufacturing and disposal present environmental concerns if PFAS is used.

None known

Heavy metals in leather tanning and dyes

Leather tanning and coloring can historically introduce chromium, lead, or cadmium; FootJoy gloves are not documented to have failed heavy metal tests. Premium leather manufacturers typically use controlled tanning processes, and golf glove leathers are not known to accumulate problematic contaminant levels under normal use.

None known

Azo dyes in leather coloring

Restricted azo dyes that release carcinogenic amines are regulated in textile and leather products in EU and many other markets. No recalls or test failures for FootJoy golf gloves on this issue are documented. Standard leather glove production typically complies with these restrictions.

Possible

Formaldehyde resins in finishing treatments

Formaldehyde-based resins are sometimes used in fabric stiffening or water-resistant finishing on textiles and leather. FootJoy does not disclose this component; no test data for this specific glove model is available. Direct skin contact is limited to the palm and fingers, and leather acts as a barrier reducing dermal absorption.

Possible

Coating degradation and particle shedding

As the water-repellent coating wears with use, microscopic particles may shed into sweat or contact skin. This is generally low-risk given the small surface area of a glove and the brief wearing period (typically 1-2 rounds per glove per season), but has not been specifically studied for this product.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 42% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel

Cobra Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Cobra

Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Golf glove, low PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated4 flags

Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.

Risky category by default

More golf equipment & apparel grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.