20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
FootJoy Men's RainGrip Golf Gloves

FootJoy · Golf Equipment & Apparel

FootJoy Men's RainGrip Golf Gloves

F · High PFAS

Golf gloves with water-repellent coating treatment; PFAS presence uncertain, no disclosure.

Verdict: Skipwater-repellent coating treatment creates uncertain PFAS exposure; no major established hazards in microfiber golf gloves, but water-repellent coating warrants cautious use and disclosure gap.

FootJoy RainGrip gloves use water-repellent finish typical of rain golf apparel. Brand does not disclose PFAS status; water-repellent coating treatments often contain PFAS compounds.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather or microfiber with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

FootJoy RainGrip gloves use synthetic microfiber or synthetic leather upper with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment applied to the surface. water-repellent coating coatings on textiles historically relied on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) to repel moisture, though some manufacturers have begun transitioning to fluorine-free alternatives; FootJoy has not publicly disclosed which chemistry is used in this product. Microfiber itself is a polyester blend that does not pose acute chemical hazards in normal hand-contact use, but the coating's composition remains the primary material concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

FootJoy (owned by Acushnet) has not issued public statements about PFAS elimination or safer water-repellent coating alternatives in their glove lines as of available records. The brand does not advertise PFAS-free or fluorine-free certifications for this product, and no third-party testing or material safety data sheets for the RainGrip glove water-repellent coating treatment are widely accessible to consumers. This silence on water-repellent chemistry is typical across golf glove manufacturers but represents a disclosure gap given growing PFAS awareness in apparel.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves with water-repellent coating treatment occupy a middle ground in textile safety: they avoid high-risk hazards like flame retardants (not relevant for gloves) and azo dyes (microfiber typically uses safer synthetic pigments), but they rely on functional coatings whose chemistry is rarely transparent. Competitors using wool or untreated leather avoid water-repellent coating chemistry entirely but sacrifice water resistance. Gloves marketed as fluorine-free or PFAS-free are emerging but remain niche; FootJoy has not positioned RainGrip in that segment.

If you buy it

Wash gloves by hand in cool water and mild soap after use to remove salt, sweat, and sunscreen buildup, which can degrade the water-repellent coating over time. Avoid machine washing, high heat, and direct sunlight storage, as these accelerate coating breakdown and may trigger leaching of residual chemicals from the treatment. Replace gloves when water no longer beads on the surface or when visible wear appears; most golf gloves last 15-20 rounds before water-repellent coating efficacy noticeably declines. If water-repellent coating transparency is important to you, contact FootJoy directly to request disclosure of the specific water-repellent chemistry used.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating composition (PFAS or alternative)

Water-repellent treatments on golf gloves commonly use PFAS-based chemistry, but FootJoy does not disclose whether this product uses legacy PFAS, newer fluorine-free alternatives, or a mixed formulation. Hand contact and sweat exposure pose low acute risk, but coating wear and laundering may mobilize residues.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in synthetic leather or finishing

No established recalls or reports of formaldehyde-release issues in FootJoy microfiber golf gloves. Synthetic microfiber textiles can contain trace formaldehyde from resin binders, but concentrations in apparel are typically far below regulatory concern for hand-contact use.

None known

Azo dyes and colorant toxicity

FootJoy gloves use synthetic pigments standard in microfiber apparel; no published testing or recalls indicate azo dye or heavy metal contamination. Microfiber colorants are generally lower-risk than natural dyes.

None known

Microfiber fiber shedding and skin irritation

Microfiber golf gloves do not typically shed fibers during normal wear because fibers are bonded into a fabric weave. No dermatological issues are on record for this product or category, and hand contact with microfiber is considered safe for skin.

Possible

Coating degradation and wear particles

As water-repellent coating ages and flakes from mechanical wear or washing, small fragments may be ingested or inhaled in trace amounts. The toxicological profile of degraded water-repellent coating particles is not well characterized in literature, making this a long-term use concern rather than an acute hazard.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel

Cobra Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Cobra

Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Golf glove, low PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated4 flags

Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.

Risky category by default

More golf equipment & apparel grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.