Cobra · Golf Equipment & Apparel
Cobra Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove
Golf glove, low PFAS risk. No water-repellent coating or special coatings apparent.
Golf gloves typically use leather or synthetic materials without water-resistant coatings or fluorochemical treatments. Cobra makes no PFAS claims, but standard golf glove construction poses lower concern than technical apparel.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The Cobra Pur Tech '26 is constructed from leather or synthetic leather with conventional stitching, avoiding water-repellent or flame-retardant treatments that typically introduce hazardous chemistry. Leather gloves rely on tanning chemistry (chromium or vegetable-based), while synthetics use polyurethane or polyester blends; neither category carries the volatile off-gassing burden of foam-backed or resin-treated textiles. Golf gloves see minimal heat exposure and no washing at extreme temperatures, reducing leaching and degradation risk.
The brand's record and disclosure
Cobra Golf is part of the Puma Group and maintains no publicly documented chemical disclosure policies or third-party certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, GOTS) specific to apparel safety. No recorded recalls or toxicological controversies exist for this model. The brand has not published restricted substance lists or supplier audits typical of higher-transparency competitors, representing a silent rather than proactive stance on material safety.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves are lower-risk than apparel with water-repellent coating finishes (which often contain PFOA/PFAS precursors) or children's clothing with strict flammability coatings. Leather and basic synthetic options represent the category baseline; specialty gloves with antimicrobial or gel padding may introduce additional chemical load. The Pur Tech line does not advertise advanced coatings or treatments, positioning it as a conventional entry rather than a high-chemistry variant.
If you buy it
Wash by hand in cool water with mild soap to preserve material integrity and avoid accelerating any tanning-chemical leaching; avoid chlorine bleach. Store in a dry environment away from direct heat to prevent premature leather/synthetic degradation. Replace when the grip surface becomes slick or material tears; typical lifespan is 1-2 seasons with regular use. No special precautions needed during wear; skin contact with leather tanning residues is negligible in normal golfing.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Heavy metals in leather tanning (chromium, cadmium)
Leather gloves may contain residual chromium (III) or trace cadmium from tanning chemistry; migration to skin is minimal in short-term wear but documented in literature for leather clothing. No brand-specific testing published for this model.
Formaldehyde resins in synthetic leather / adhesives
Polyurethane or polyester synthetic leather backing may contain formaldehyde-releasing resins in coatings or stitching adhesives. Cobra has not disclosed formaldehyde testing; presence is plausible but not reported as a category concern for golf gloves.
Azo dyes (carcinogenic breakdown products)
Standard leather and synthetic textiles may be dyed with azo compounds; no specific hazard reported for Cobra golf gloves and no public testing indicates contamination. EU/REACH restrictions limit high-risk azo dyes in textiles.
Antimony in polyester (if synthetic)
If the synthetic component is polyester, trace antimony may be present as a catalyst residue; levels in finished textiles are typically very low and not documented as a concern in golf glove use.
VOC off-gassing from stitching adhesives
Thread adhesives and seam sealants may release volatile organic compounds during the first few days of use or storage; risk is low for a glove with minimal surface area and ventilation during wear.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More golf equipment & apparel grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.