20/ 100
F
OverallF8/100
Mizuno Golf Rainfit Gloves Pair Black Men's M GRF17P3-09

Mizuno · Golf Equipment & Apparel

Mizuno Golf Rainfit Gloves Pair Black Men's M GRF17P3-09

F · High PFAS

Golf glove with water-repellent coating; PFAS disclosure absent, uncertain risk.

Verdict: SkipSynthetic leather golf glove with undisclosed water-repellent coating (likely PFAS); no major non-PFAS hazards documented, but water-repellent coating chemistry and brand silence warrant cautious use.

Mizuno Rainfit gloves use water-repellent treatment typical of rain apparel, but the brand provides no PFAS information. water-repellent coating finishes often contain PFAS; independent verification lacking.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather/polyurethane with water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These gloves use polyurethane-based synthetic leather, which is engineered to mimic leather durability while offering water resistance. The water-repellent finish (water-repellent coating) is the critical unknown: most golf-glove water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve durable water beading, though some brands have moved to non-fluorinated alternatives without public announcement. Polyurethane itself is stable during normal wear but can degrade under heat or UV, potentially releasing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in poorly formulated products.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mizuno is a major Japanese sportswear manufacturer with no public record of independent chemical testing, PFAS commitments, or transparency in apparel safety reporting as of available records. The company does not appear to have signed the Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHC) initiative or published restricted substance lists for gloves, leaving the water-repellent coating formulation entirely opaque. No recalls or documented safety incidents specific to Mizuno golf gloves are known, but the silence on fluorinated chemistry is the concern.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves occupy a niche where water resistance is marketed as essential, making them prime candidates for PFAS-heavy coatings. Brands like Callaway, TaylorMade, and FootJoy use similar synthetic leather with undisclosed water-repellent coating finishes, meaning this product is typical, not outlier. A small number of premium gloves now offer PFAS-free water resistance (e.g., some wool or organic cotton blends), but synthetic leather remains the category standard. Mizuno's lack of transparency is consistent with broader golf-apparel practice but not better.

If you buy it

Wash hands after removing gloves to minimize skin contact with any coating residue; do not machine wash or expose to heat above 40C, which may accelerate polyurethane breakdown. Store in cool, dry conditions and replace after visible cracking, peeling, or loss of water beading (typically 1-2 seasons of regular use). If PFAS exposure is a personal concern, contact Mizuno directly to request water-repellent coating formulation details; lack of response suggests conventional fluorinated chemistry. Consider rotating with an untreated glove or one from a brand with published non-PFAS coatings on days when water resistance is non-critical.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fluorinated water-repellent coating (PFAS)

water-repellent coating finish composition is undisclosed by Mizuno. Golf gloves historically use PFAS-based Teflon-family coating; no public statement confirms this glove uses alternatives. Risk is dermal absorption and environmental persistence if coating sheds or glove is discarded.

Possible

Polyurethane thermal degradation and VOC release

Synthetic leather can release volatile organics if exposed to prolonged heat (sweat in hot weather, machine washing, or storage near heat sources). No formulation data available to assess Mizuno's specific polyurethane stability or additive package.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in synthetic leather adhesives

No documented formaldehyde issues specific to Mizuno gloves; polyurethane-based synthetics typically use less formaldehyde than cotton-polyester blends, but adhesives and backing resins may contain urea-formaldehyde. No recalls or test results on record.

None known

Heavy metals in dyes or pigments (black colorant)

Black synthetic leather may use carbon black or organic azo dyes; neither is flagged as problematic in golf gloves, and migration to skin during normal wear is unlikely given the polyurethane barrier. No incidents reported for this product or brand.

Possible

Microplastic shedding from coating or backing

water-repellent coating coatings and polyurethane backing can shed microparticles during wear and washing. Significance is low for personal health (hand exposure) but relevant for environmental persistence if the product ends up in landfill or marine environments.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel

Cobra Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Cobra

Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Golf glove, low PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated4 flags

Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.

Risky category by default

More golf equipment & apparel grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.