Lamson Sharp · Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets & Utensils
Lamson 2-Piece Kitchen Turner Set
Kitchen turners are lower concern; avoid if nonstick coating present.
Lamson Sharp turners appear to be basic stainless steel or silicone tools with minimal coating risk. Brand discloses no PFAS information, so confirm product details before purchase.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Stainless steel or silicone blade, handle material unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Kitchen turners in this set likely pair a stainless steel or heat-resistant silicone blade with an unspecified handle material (often plastic, wood, or composite). Stainless steel blades are chemically inert during cooking and do not leach metals or off-gas compounds under normal heat exposure. If the blade is silicone, the hazard depends on grade: food-grade silicone is generally safe, but cheaper formulations may contain unreacted oligomers that migrate into food at high temperatures. Handle material is critical but unmarked in available product specs; opaque sourcing suggests potential for undisclosed plastics or adhesives.
The brand's record and disclosure
Lamson Sharp is a mid-tier cookware tool brand with no published safety certifications, third-party testing results, or transparent material sourcing statements on record. The company has not faced major recalls or safety controversies linked to their turner products. Absence of material specification (particularly for the handle) reflects industry-wide opacity in small tool marketing rather than proven misconduct, but limits your ability to verify composition before purchase.
How it compares in its category
Kitchen turners are among the lowest-risk cooking tools because they do not conduct high heat into food and do not require nonstick coatings (the primary PFAS vector in cookware). Stainless steel turners are equivalent in safety to OXO or Victorinox equivalents. Silicone-blade turners carry slightly higher leaching risk than metal alternatives, especially if the silicone grade is not explicitly certified as food-grade or if the handle adhesive is poor quality. Two-piece sets offer no additional safety benefit or liability versus single turners.
If you buy it
Use at temperatures below 500°F (260°C) if the blade is silicone; stainless steel has no practical heat limit. Wash by hand; dishwashers may degrade adhesives in multi-part construction over time. Inspect the handle joint for cracks or separation after 1-2 years of regular use; discard if adhesive fails or if silicone begins to degrade or cloud. Avoid prolonged soaking of the handle if it is plastic, as water ingress can weaken internal bonds.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Silicone leaching (if blade material)
If the turner blade is silicone rather than stainless steel, low-grade formulations may release oligomers at temperatures above 400°F. Product specs do not confirm silicone grade or food certification, so risk cannot be ruled out without direct contact with manufacturer.
Handle adhesive or plastic offgassing
The handle material is not disclosed. If plastic, unknown adhesives bonding the blade to the handle may off-gas volatile compounds, particularly if the product sat in warm storage before purchase. Food-contact surfaces of the handle should be low-risk, but interior joints are opaque.
Metal leaching (if stainless steel blade is substandard)
Lamson is a recognized brand; stainless steel turners from established makers rarely leach nickel or chromium into food. No recalls or testing issues are on record for this product line. Risk is negligible if the product meets basic stainless steel alloy standards.
Coating degradation (if any nonstick finish present)
Kitchen turners are not typically nonstick-coated, as they do not contact hot cooking surfaces long enough to require it. If this product does carry a nonstick layer, that would introduce Teflon-type coating or alternative Teflon-family coating hazards; available product descriptions do not indicate a coating.
Long-term structural failure and sharp edges
Two-piece construction introduces a failure point at the blade-handle junction. Separation or corrosion over years of use could expose internal adhesive or create sharp edges. This is a durability issue rather than a chemical hazard, but relevant to safe long-term ownership.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 65% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets & Utensils
GreenPan
Platinum Silicone Tongs
silicone, stainless steel handle
Silicone tongs lower PFAS concern, but verify specific batch claims independently
⚠Risky category by default
GreenPan
Williams Sonoma Greenpan Premiere Collection Wide Tongs
stainless steel with silicone handle
Stainless steel tongs with PFAS-free claim; lower concern for non-coated utensil.
⚠Risky category by default
T-fal
Tefal Ingenio K2060714 Steel Food Tongs
stainless steel, bare uncoated
Bare stainless steel tongs, no coating risk for PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
More non-stick kitchen gadgets & utensils grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.