FootJoy · Golf Equipment & Apparel
FootJoy GTxtreme White/Red 64883 Wht/
Golf shoe with likely water-repellent coating treatment, PFAS status unclear from brand.
FootJoy GTxtreme is a golf shoe with synthetic uppers and waterproof technology, typically using water-repellent coating-treated coatings that may contain PFAS. Brand discloses nothing about PFAS use or avoidance.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Synthetic leather or polyurethane upper with waterproof membrane
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This shoe uses a synthetic leather or polyurethane upper paired with a waterproof membrane, likely a thermoplastic layer bonded to the outer material. Polyurethane itself is stable during normal wear but can degrade when exposed to sustained heat, UV, or harsh chemicals, potentially releasing volatile organic compounds. The waterproof treatment is the primary unknown: FootJoy does not publicly disclose whether their water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating contains PFAS compounds, which are standard in performance golf footwear.
The brand's record and disclosure
FootJoy, owned by Acushnet Holdings, does not publish transparent material or chemical disclosures for individual shoe lines on their website or marketing materials. The company has not signed commitments to phase out PFAS or adopted third-party certifications (such as GOTS or Cradle to Cradle) that would indicate rigorous chemical screening. No public recalls or safety violations are documented for this specific model, though the brand's silence on waterproofing chemistry is a notable gap in consumer transparency.
How it compares in its category
Golf shoes in this mid-to-premium range almost universally use synthetic uppers with waterproof membranes, making this model typical rather than exceptional. Competitors like Ecco and some Adidas golf lines offer similar construction but occasionally reference material compliance or testing, whereas FootJoy does not. The lack of brand-level disclosure about PFAS or restricted substances places this shoe in a lower transparency tier compared to athletic brands with published chemical safety policies.
If you buy it
Avoid sustained exposure to direct heat sources (radiators, car dashboards) and UV, as polyurethane can harden or crack prematurely under stress. Clean with mild soap and cool water rather than harsh solvents, and allow air drying away from heat. Store in a cool, dry place; expect the membrane and synthetic upper to remain durable for 2-3 seasons of regular play if not subjected to extreme conditions. Replace when the synthetic leather shows visible cracking, peeling, or when waterproofing noticeably fails.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Azo dyes in synthetic leather or polyurethane upper
Synthetic leather and polyurethane dyes may contain azo compounds that can release aromatic amines under sweat or friction. No specific test data is public for this model, but azo dyes are common in low-cost and mid-range synthetic footwear; higher-end brands often specify azo-free dye systems.
Formaldehyde resins in adhesives and coatings
Polyurethane bonding and waterproof membrane application typically involve formaldehyde-containing resins. Footwear manufacturers do not routinely disclose formaldehyde content or off-gassing rates; new shoe odor often reflects residual formaldehyde from manufacturing.
Polyurethane degradation and VOC release under heat or UV
The synthetic upper and membrane can degrade over time, especially if stored in hot or sunlit environments, releasing volatile organic compounds and potentially compromising waterproofing. This is a natural aging process rather than a manufacturing defect but is accelerated by poor storage.
Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather wear
No published studies on shedding rates for this specific shoe model exist. Synthetic leather uppers do shed microfibers during use; the extent and environmental impact remain poorly quantified for performance footwear.
Heavy metals or antimony in polyester-based membrane or trim
If the waterproof membrane or reinforcement includes polyester, antimony trioxide (a catalyst residue) may be present in trace amounts. FootJoy does not provide material testing or heavy metal screening data; no recall or contamination report exists for this model.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel
Cobra
Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove
Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching
Golf glove, low PFAS risk.
⚠Risky category by default
Honma
Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl
Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing
Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.
⚠Risky category by default
Honma
Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit
Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips
Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf equipment & apparel grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.