Dunlop · Golf Equipment & Apparel
Maxfli Rain Golf Gloves
Rain golf glove with water-repellent coating finish; PFAS risk unclear, brand silent.
Maxfli Rain Golf Gloves use water-resistant treatment typical of rain apparel, likely water-repellent coating-coated. Dunlop provides no PFAS disclosure; elevated uncertainty without lab data or certification.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Synthetic leather/microfiber with water-resistant treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Maxfli Rain gloves use synthetic microfiber (polyester/nylon blend) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the palm and back. water-repellent coating coatings are the primary safety question here: most use either Teflon-type coating-based or fluorocarbon-free alternatives, but Dunlop has not disclosed which. Microfiber itself is stable and does not shed microplastics into skin under normal wear. The material does not require high heat during use, reducing degradation risk.
The brand's record and disclosure
Dunlop (Sumitomo Rubber subsidiary) does not publish detailed chemical disclosures for apparel products or state whether their water-repellent coating finishes are PFAS-free or PFAS-containing. The brand has no known public commitments to phasing out fluorinated water repellents. No recalls or established safety controversies exist for this specific product line, but the silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is a material gap in transparency for a water-resistant sports glove.
How it compares in its category
Rain gloves in this segment typically use either PFAS-based water-repellent coating (fast-acting, durable) or newer Teflon-type coating-free fluorocarbon or silicone alternatives (slower adoption, often higher price). Maxfli occupies the mainstream budget tier and does not market an eco or PFAS-free variant. Direct competitors like Callaway, TaylorMade, and some PGA Tour models offer similar microfiber construction but vary widely in water-repellent coating disclosure.
If you buy it
Wash gloves in cool water with mild detergent; avoid machine drying and direct heat to preserve the water-repellent coating finish. Replace when water no longer beads or when grip padding wears (typically 1-2 seasons of regular play). Do not tumble dry or expose to extreme heat, as this can degrade synthetic fibers and coatings. Store in a cool, dry place between uses to extend lifespan and maintain water-repellency.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
water-repellent coating chemistry (fluorocarbon/PFAS status)
Dunlop does not disclose whether the water-resistant finish uses Teflon-type coating/PFOA or fluorocarbon-free alternatives. Most mid-market golf glove water-repellent coating finishes still use legacy fluorinated compounds; this product's specific formulation is unconfirmed.
Formaldehyde in fabric treatment or finish
No reports of formaldehyde-releasing resins in Maxfli glove production. Synthetic microfiber does not typically require formaldehyde-based cross-linking.
Azo dyes or heavy metals in pigments
Maxfli gloves are not marketed with special color claims or metallic finishes that would suggest pigment contamination. Standard synthetic apparel testing protocols apply.
Flame retardant additives
Golf gloves are not treated with flame retardants as a standard feature; this hazard is not relevant to the product category.
Skin irritation from synthetic material or finish residue
Microfiber itself is non-irritating, but fresh water-repellent coating finishes can occasionally cause mild sensitization in sensitive users until a few washes. Contact dermatitis risk is low but not zero for new gloves.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel
Cobra
Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove
Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching
Golf glove, low PFAS risk.
⚠Risky category by default
Honma
Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl
Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing
Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.
⚠Risky category by default
Honma
Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit
Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips
Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf equipment & apparel grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.