Dunlop · Golf Equipment & Apparel
Dunlop Women’s Left Hand Golf Glove, Large. All-weather Dupont
Leather glove with DuPont all-weather coating; PFAS risk unclear without disclosure.
All-weather golf gloves typically use water-repellent finishes that may contain PFAS, though DuPont's specific formulation is not publicly disclosed. No PFAS-free claim or third-party verification available.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather with all-weather DuPont treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This glove is genuine leather with a DuPont all-weather synthetic coating or finish applied to improve water resistance and durability. Leather itself is a processed animal hide, treated during tanning (historically with chromium salts, now often vegetable-tanned). The DuPont treatment is the chemical unknown here: it could be a Teflon-family coating resin (which would introduce PFAS risk) or a non-fluorinated polyurethane or acrylic polymer, but Dunlop does not disclose which. Leather inherently resists most hazards (formaldehyde resins, azo dyes, heavy metal pigments) because it is not a synthetic textile.
The brand's record and disclosure
Dunlop (part of Sumitomo Rubber since 1984) does not publicly disclose PFAS content in apparel or whether their all-weather treatments use fluorinated compounds. No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific glove model. The brand's silence on PFAS treatment chemistry is consistent with the broader golf-apparel industry, where waterproofing coatings are rarely detailed to consumers. Dunlop is a legacy sports equipment maker with stable manufacturing but minimal third-party certifications for chemical safety.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves are a low-hazard category compared to, for example, athletic shoes or jackets with flame-retardant finishes. Leather golf gloves are generally safer than synthetic-mesh gloves, which may contain formaldehyde-based binders or azo dyes. The main variable here is the waterproofing treatment: many premium golf gloves (especially all-weather models from brands like TaylorMade, FootJoy, Callaway) use similar proprietary coatings with undisclosed PFAS status. Dunlop's offering is mid-market and unremarkable in transparency relative to competitors.
If you buy it
Wash the glove by hand in cool water with mild soap to preserve the leather and coating; avoid machine washing and high heat. Do not soak it for extended periods, as water can penetrate the stitching and degrade the inner lining. Replace the glove when the grip surface becomes slick, the leather cracks, or the seams separate, typically after 6-12 months of regular play. Store it dry in a ventilated space and avoid prolonged direct sunlight, which can cause leather fading and coating brittleness.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
PFAS in all-weather coating
DuPont's name on the label raises concern because DuPont historically manufactured Teflon-family coating (e.g., Teflon), but this glove's specific treatment is not disclosed. Without product documentation, PFAS presence cannot be ruled out. Contact with skin is low-risk; concern is mainly migration into sweat during use.
Leather tanning residues (chromium, formaldehyde)
Dunlop does not specify tanning method (chrome vs. vegetable), and no recalls or regulatory action are recorded for their golf gloves. If chrome-tanned, residual chromium III (low toxicity) may be present but poses negligible risk from hand contact; formaldehyde use in leather finishing is rare and not flagged in this product line.
Synthetic lining irritation or off-gassing
The inner lining material is not specified in available product information. If polyester or nylon-based, risk of volatile organic compounds or formaldehyde releasers is low under normal wear (no heat exposure, well-ventilated use). No adverse reactions reported for this glove model.
Coating degradation and microparticle shedding
Repeated flexing, washing, and UV exposure can cause the all-weather coating to crack and shed microscopic particles. These are unlikely to be inhaled during golf use but could accumulate in wash water. Visible flaking signals replacement is needed.
Heavy metals in leather dyes or finishes
Leather golf gloves typically use iron oxide or chromium-based tannins for color, both of which pose minimal skin-contact hazard. No lead or cadmium contamination has been reported in Dunlop glove products. Risk is negligible during normal use.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 62% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel
Cobra
Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove
Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching
Golf glove, low PFAS risk.
⚠Risky category by default
Honma
Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl
Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing
Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.
⚠Risky category by default
Honma
Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit
Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips
Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf equipment & apparel grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.