20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Dunlop Men’s Left Hand Golf Glove, Xl All-weather Dupont Coolmax,

Dunlop · Golf Equipment & Apparel

Dunlop Men’s Left Hand Golf Glove, Xl All-weather Dupont Coolmax,

F · High PFAS

All-weather gloves often use water-repellent coating coatings; Dunlop discloses nothing about PFAS.

Verdict: SkipDupont Coolmax polyester with undisclosed all-weather treatment poses likely PFAS exposure; non-PFAS hazards minimal but all-weather durability unverified long-term.

Dunlop's all-weather treatment suggests water repellency, which commonly involves PFAS durable water repellents. No PFAS disclosure or third-party verification found for this product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Dupont Coolmax polyester blend, all-weather treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This glove is constructed from Dupont Coolmax, a polyester microfiber engineered for moisture-wicking and breathability. Polyester itself carries minimal intrinsic toxicity at the fiber level, but the 'all-weather' finish is the concern: manufacturers typically apply water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings to polyester gloves, which historically relied on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve water and oil resistance. Dunlop's product description does not specify the water-repellent coating chemistry, leaving the fluorine status unknown.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dunlop (owned by Sumitomo Rubber) does not publicly disclose PFAS presence, phase-out commitments, or alternative water-repellent coating technologies for this glove line. No recalls or safety warnings for this specific product are on record. The brand has not published environmental or chemical transparency reports that would clarify treatment protocols, making independent verification impossible based on available information.

How it compares in its category

Most all-weather golf gloves rely on water-repellent coating finishes; this product is typical in that regard. Competitors like Titleist and Callaway have similarly maintained public silence on PFAS. Uncoated or minimally treated leather or synthetic alternatives exist but sacrifice the all-weather performance this glove promises. The Coolmax fiber itself is mainstream and poses no documented hazard above standard polyester apparel.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cool water to limit microfiber shedding into waterways; avoid high-heat drying (air dry instead). Replace when water-repellent coating performance visibly degrades (water no longer beads on surface), typically after 1-2 seasons of regular play. Do not assume 'all-weather' means indefinite durability; expect coating wear over time. Store in a dry location to extend water-repellent coating lifespan.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

Fluorinated water-repellent coating (PFAS)

All-weather finish almost certainly involves PFAS-based water-repellent coating; Dunlop provides no alternative specification, making fluorine presence the most probable scenario for this product class.

None known

Azo dyes in polyester

No specific recalls or reports of restricted azo dyes in Dunlop Coolmax gloves. Standard polyester apparel manufacturing in developed markets typically avoids banned azo compounds, though independent testing of this product is not on record.

Possible

Formaldehyde resins in finishing

Formaldehyde-based resins are sometimes used in polyester finishing and wrinkle resistance treatments. Dunlop does not disclose finishing chemistry, so presence cannot be ruled out, though polyester gloves generally require less formaldehyde than cotton blends.

None known

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony trioxide is a known catalyst in polyester manufacturing. No specific contamination reports exist for Dunlop Coolmax gloves, and regulatory limits apply in most markets where this product is sold.

Reported

Microfiber shedding during washing

Coolmax microfibers, like all synthetic textiles, shed during laundering. This is not a direct health hazard to the wearer but an environmental concern; washing in cold water and limiting machine cycles reduces release.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 55% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel

Cobra Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Cobra

Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Golf glove, low PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated4 flags

Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.

Risky category by default

More golf equipment & apparel grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.