20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Cobra StormGrip Winter Golf Gloves

Cobra · Golf Equipment & Apparel

Cobra StormGrip Winter Golf Gloves

F · High PFAS

Winter golf glove with water-repellent coating; PFAS disclosure absent, higher concern.

Verdict: SkipSynthetic winter glove with undisclosed water-resistant coating; PFAS concern plus standard textile risks warrant careful use and disclosure demand.

Cobra StormGrip gloves use synthetic materials with water-resistant treatment typical of winter sports apparel. Brand provides no PFAS information; water-repellent coating coatings commonly contain PFAS, though not always.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

synthetic leather/microfiber with water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Cobra StormGrip gloves combine synthetic leather (likely polyurethane or PVC) with microfiber lining and a water-resistant (water-repellent coating) topcoat. The water-repellent coating treatment is the primary chemical concern: most spray-applied water-repellent finishes historically relied on fluorinated compounds (PFAS), though some brands now use fluorine-free alternatives. Cobra has not publicly disclosed which technology is used in this model. Synthetic leather itself is generally lower-risk than natural leather, but polyurethane degradation and microfiber shedding under wear are documented issues in textiles.

The brand's record and disclosure

Cobra (owned by Puma/TaylorMade) does not maintain a publicly accessible chemicals or PFAS disclosure policy for apparel products. No independent certifications (Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, GOTS) are claimed for these gloves on product pages. The brand has not responded to retail or advocacy inquiries about fluorinated water-repellent use in winter sportswear. This silence is noteworthy: major golf and athletic brands (Nike, Adidas) have committed to PFAS phase-out; Cobra's lack of transparency suggests either legacy formulations or indifference to disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Winter golf gloves occupy a middle ground for chemical risk. Performance brands (Footjoy, TaylorMade) typically use the same water-repellent coating technologies without always disclosing them either. Budget alternatives (generic PVC gloves) often skip water-repellent coating entirely, reducing PFAS exposure but sacrificing durability. Premium options (some merino wool blends) may avoid synthetic coatings altogether. Cobra positions itself as a performance brand, so the absence of transparency is less defensible than for budget lines.

If you buy it

Wash gloves in cool water with mild detergent before first use to reduce loose dyes and finishes. Avoid hot water and machine drying, which accelerates microfiber breakdown and polyurethane degradation. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent mildew (moisture + synthetic materials can off-gas low levels of volatile compounds). Replace when water no longer beads on the surface, typically after 1-2 seasons of regular use; degraded coatings lose water resistance and may shed particles. Demand Cobra's water-repellent coating chemical specification via customer service; lack of response is a red flag.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

Fluorinated water-resistant (water-repellent coating) coating (PFAS-class)

No disclosure from Cobra on whether this glove uses fluorinated or fluorine-free water-repellent coating. Winter golf gloves marketed with 'storm' or water-resistant claims almost always use topical coatings; historically these are PFAS-based. The coating is contact-level exposure during wear and may leach slightly during washing.

Possible

Synthetic leather (polyurethane/PVC) degradation

Synthetic leather degrades with flexing and heat, especially in microfiber gloves subject to repeated hand grip and weather exposure. Degradation releases microplastics and can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at low levels. This is a use-life issue, not an acute hazard, but relevant for long-term wear.

Possible

Microfiber shedding

Microfiber linings shed fine synthetic particles during washing and wear. In small amounts this is a nuisance; in aggregate from frequent washing it contributes to aquatic microplastic load. Gloves are lower-risk than textiles with larger surface area, but still relevant for environmentally conscious users.

None known

Azo dyes or heavy metal pigments

No recalls or public health reports linked to Cobra StormGrip colorants. Synthetic leather and microfiber are typically dyed with modern azo dyes, which are regulated but can release aromatic amines under certain conditions. No specific testing of this product is available.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in adhesives or finishes

Glove assembly may use formaldehyde-releasing adhesives between synthetic leather and lining layers. This is standard in the category and typically off-gasses minimally in the glove format, but no third-party testing of this brand is on record.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel

Cobra Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Cobra

Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Golf glove, low PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated4 flags

Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.

Risky category by default

More golf equipment & apparel grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.