20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
Cobra Pur Tour Golf Glove

Cobra · Golf Equipment & Apparel

Cobra Pur Tour Golf Glove

F · High PFAS

Golf glove durability treatment may contain PFAS; brand silent on composition.

Verdict: SkipLeather golf glove with likely PFAS water-resistance treatment; no specific safety incidents on record, but brand transparency absent. Safe with informed use and care.

Cobra does not disclose PFAS presence or absence in this glove. Water-resistant golf gloves often use water-repellent coating treatments that may contain PFAS, but no independent testing available for this specific product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather or synthetic leather with moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Cobra Pur Tour Golf Glove is constructed from leather or synthetic leather with a moisture-wicking treatment applied to the palm and fingers. That treatment is almost certainly a water-repellent or sweat-resistant finish, common across premium golf gloves to maintain grip in humid conditions. The leather base itself is stable when dry, but the functional coating, likely a fluorinated polymer or silicone-based finish, is where durability and potential chemical concerns intersect. Cobra does not publicly disclose the exact composition of this treatment.

The brand's record and disclosure

Cobra (owned by Puma/Pentland Group) does not maintain publicly visible transparency about chemical composition or PFAS use in golf gloves. No major product recalls or health incidents involving Cobra golf gloves have been reported in public databases. The brand has not pursued third-party certifications (e.g., Bluesign, OEKO-TEX) for this category that would indicate proactive chemical management. This silence is typical for the golf equipment industry, where moisture-treatment formulations are treated as proprietary.

How it compares in its category

Most premium leather golf gloves, from Titleist, FootJoy, and Callaway, use similar water-resistant coatings without public disclosure. Cobra's Pur Tour sits in the mid-to-premium range and is not known for worse chemical practices than competitors. A small number of brands (e.g., some eco-conscious makers) offer untreated or plant-based alternative gloves, but these sacrifice durability and grip performance that golfers expect. Cobra's approach reflects industry standard opacity rather than elevated risk.

If you buy it

Wear the glove during play and allow it to air-dry naturally after use; do not machine wash or expose to high heat, which can degrade the treatment and potentially release volatile compounds. Inspect for cracking or peeling of the coating every 3-6 months; once the treatment deteriorates, replace the glove rather than attempting repair. Store in a dry, cool place away from direct sunlight. Wash your hands after use if you have sensitive skin, as residual treatment may transfer during sweat-soaked play.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Teflon-type coating or fluorinated polymer fume risk (moisture-treatment coating)

Water-repellent finishes on golf gloves may contain Teflon-type coating or similar fluorinated compounds. Risk is negligible during normal wear at body temperature, but decomposition could theoretically occur if glove is accidentally exposed to direct flame or very high heat (e.g., near a grill). No reported incidents in the product category.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in leather or synthetic base

Leather tanning and synthetic leather production sometimes involve formaldehyde-based crosslinkers. Cobra does not disclose tanning methods. Off-gassing from golf gloves is minimal due to small surface area and outdoor use, but individuals with formaldehyde sensitivity should air the glove in sunlight before first wear.

None known

Azo dyes in leather or synthetic dyes

If the glove is dyed (most are), azo dyes could theoretically be present depending on tanning facility standards. Cobra does not specify dye sourcing. Migration risk is low because dyes are bound to the material, but prolonged contact with sweat (high salt/moisture) over years of use could theoretically mobilize trace dyes. No documented cases in golf gloves.

Possible

Skin irritation or contact dermatitis from treatment chemicals

Individuals with sensitive skin or fragrance/chemical sensitivities may experience mild irritation from residual coating chemicals or breakdown products during heavy sweating. This is not a systemic toxicity risk but a localized irritation risk. Wearing a thin cotton liner glove underneath is a practical mitigation.

None known

Microplastic or coating particle shedding

As the moisture-treatment coating ages and cracks, small particles may shed into sweat or be released during hand washing. The quantity is negligible for a single glove used seasonally, but no published studies exist on cumulative exposure from sports equipment coatings. Not a documented hazard in this product.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel

Cobra Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Cobra

Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove

Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Golf glove, low PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl

Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated4 flags

Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.

Risky category by default

Honma Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Honma

Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit

Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.

Risky category by default

More golf equipment & apparel grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.