Cobra · Golf Equipment & Apparel
Cobra Men's Pur Tech Golf Glove
Golf glove with water-repellent coating treatment; Cobra does not disclose PFAS status.
Golf gloves typically use water-repellent coatings on synthetic or leather materials, often containing PFAS. Cobra provides no public disclosure on PFAS content or safer alternatives for this product line.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather palm with synthetic backing, likely water-repellent coating-treated
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The Cobra Pur Tech glove combines leather on the palm (for grip and durability) with synthetic backing, likely polyester or nylon blended with spandex for stretch and moisture management. The 'Pur Tech' branding suggests performance coating, and the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish is almost certainly applied to the synthetic or leather surface to shed sweat and rain. water-repellent coating finishes on textiles are a common vector for PFAS, though formulations vary widely in their fluorine content and persistence.
The brand's record and disclosure
Cobra (owned by Puma/TaylorMade) does not publicly disclose PFAS use or water-repellent coating chemistry for its golf apparel. The brand has not published a PFAS elimination commitment or third-party certifications (e.g., Bluesign, OEKO-TEX) that would suggest fluorine-free water repellency. This silence is typical for mid-tier golf brands but contrasts with leading outdoor brands that now specify PFAS-free water-repellent coating. No major recalls or contamination incidents on record for Cobra gloves.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves are a small, lower-exposure category compared to outerwear, but they sit on skin and are handled frequently. Leather-palm synthetic-back gloves like this are standard; competitors (Titleist, FootJoy, Callaway) operate under similar disclosure gaps. Brands offering certified PFAS-free or fluorine-free water-repellent coating golf gloves are rare; most use traditional fluorochemical finishes without labeling.
If you buy it
Wash before first use if possible to reduce any residual coating treatments. Avoid heat (no dryer) and do not iron. Replace when the palm material tears, seams fail, or grip degrades, typically after 6-12 months of regular play. If you are sensitive to chemical finishes or concerned about PFAS exposure, contact Cobra directly to request water-repellent coating chemistry; lack of response may warrant switching to brands with transparent PFAS policies.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
PFAS in water-repellent coating
Cobra does not disclose water-repellent coating formulation. Fluorochemical water repellents (C6 or legacy C8 PFAS) are still common in performance apparel. Skin contact during wear and hand-washing may constitute minor exposure, though gloves do not cover large body surface area.
Formaldehyde resins in synthetic backing
No recalls or alerts on record for Cobra golf gloves. Formaldehyde use in polyester/nylon blends is regulated under Oeko-Tex and EU standards; risk is low if the glove carries basic certifications, which Cobra does not publicly advertise.
Azo dye allergens
Leather and synthetic textiles can be dyed with azo compounds, some of which are sensitizers. No specific incidents reported for Cobra gloves. Sweat on the palm may increase dye migration slightly, but exposure is localized to hands.
Synthetic fiber degradation and microfiber shedding
Frequent hand motion and friction during golf use may accelerate wear of synthetic backing fibers, releasing microfiber particles. This is cosmetic and hygiene concern rather than acute toxicity, but cumulative exposure is not well-studied.
Leather tanning residues
Leather palm may contain chromium or other tanning agents, but exposure is minimal during normal wear. Cobra does not specify tanning method; vegetable-tanned leather would pose no chemical risk. No contamination alerts on record.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Apparel
Cobra
Pur Tech '26 Left Golf Glove
Leather or synthetic leather with standard stitching
Golf glove, low PFAS risk.
⚠Risky category by default
Honma
Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's White 6 Pcs Set M L Xl
Synthetic leather or polyurethane palm with fabric backing
Lower concern. Golf gloves typically avoid PFAS-prone coatings.
⚠Risky category by default
Honma
Golf Gloves Speed Monster Men's M Size White 3 Set Stretch & Fit
Stretch fabric blend, likely polyester/spandex with synthetic grips
Golf glove with no known PFAS concerns, no disclosure found.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf equipment & apparel grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.