40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
RTIC Ultra-Dry Duffle Pack

Waterproof Technologies · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

RTIC Ultra-Dry Duffle Pack

F · High PFAS

Unknown waterproof treatment raises concern; request material specs.

Verdict: SkipUnknown water-repellent coating chemistry and silent PFAS stance create uncertainty; product serviceable with transparency request to manufacturer.

Waterproof duffle bags typically use water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS, but brand does not disclose treatment method or materials. No independent testing or PFAS claims available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Unspecified fabric with water-repellent coating waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The RTIC Ultra-Dry Duffle Pack uses an unspecified fabric substrate with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on PFAS compounds (perfluorocarbons), though some newer formulations use non-fluorinated alternatives. Without material disclosure from RTIC, the coating chemistry cannot be confirmed, making chemical exposure risk assessment incomplete. The fabric base itself is not specified beyond waterproofing claims, so typical textile hazards (dyes, resins, finishes) cannot be ruled in or out.

The brand's record and disclosure

RTIC (Waterproof Technologies) has not published public material safety data sheets, ingredient disclosures, or PFAS-avoidance commitments for this product line. No third-party certifications (Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, GOTS) are evident in available product documentation. The brand's silence on water-repellent chemistry is notable given widespread industry awareness of PFAS concerns in outdoor gear since the mid-2010s. No recalls or safety incidents specific to this model are on public record.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof duffle packs occupy a middle tier of consumer gear; comparable brands (Patagonia, Arc'teryx, some REI Co-op lines) increasingly disclose PFAS-free or responsibly sourced water-repellent coating treatments. RTIC's lack of transparency is below the current disclosure standard for premium outdoor brands, though not unusual for value-tier manufacturers. The product's waterproof durability likely depends on coating integrity, which is less documented than competitors' multi-year performance claims.

If you buy it

Request detailed material composition and water-repellent coating treatment information from RTIC customer service before purchase if PFAS exposure concerns you. Avoid machine washing or high-heat drying, which can degrade coatings and potentially release volatile compounds. Store in a cool, dry place and inspect the coating annually for peeling, cracking, or delamination that would trigger replacement. Hand-wash with mild soap if needed; commercial detergents can strip water-repellent coating properties and may contain surfactants that interact unpredictably with unknown coating chemistry.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating degradation and leachables

Unspecified water-repellent coating chemistry means unknown stability under heat, UV, or wear. Coating breakdown over time could release incompletely characterized compounds into contact with stored items, particularly food or textiles.

None known

Formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing resins in fabric finish

Fabric base composition not disclosed. If it contains cellulose or cotton with resin finishes (common in water-resistant textiles), formaldehyde-based cross-linkers are possible but unconfirmed in available information.

None known

Azo dyes in fabric coloring

Product color and dye source not specified. Textile dyes in industrial outdoor gear may include banned or restricted azo compounds, though no incidents are documented for this brand or model.

Possible

VOC off-gassing from coating or adhesives

water-repellent coating coatings and fabric lamination adhesives can off-gas volatile organic compounds, particularly when new or stored in warm conditions. Unspecified formulation means emissions profile is unknown; ventilation during initial use recommended.

None known

Bacterial or mold growth in wet storage

Waterproof packs can trap moisture if not fully dried after use. No antimicrobial treatment is disclosed, so risk depends on user maintenance rather than product chemistry.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.