40/ 100
F
OverallF18/100
The North Face Summit Series Advanced Mountain Kit 140L Duffel

The North Face · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

The North Face Summit Series Advanced Mountain Kit 140L Duffel

F · High PFAS

High PFAS risk from water-repellent coating; The North Face does not disclose treatment.

Verdict: SkipHigh PFAS risk from undisclosed water-repellent coating; no other major hazards documented. Buy only if water-repellent coating treatment acceptable to you.

Large duffel bags typically use water-repellent coating-coated textiles for waterproofing, historically a PFAS source. The North Face provides no PFAS transparency for this product line.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester fabric with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This duffel uses nylon and polyester fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to shed moisture. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on long-chain PFAS (PFOA, PFOS) or their replacements, which persist in the environment and body. The North Face has not publicly disclosed which water-repellent coating chemistry is used on this model. Nylon and polyester themselves are stable polymers with low direct toxicity under normal use, but the treatment is the primary concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face (owned by VF Corporation) has not made public commitments to eliminate PFAS in apparel or gear as of available records, and does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry on product labels or websites. VF Corporation competitors (e.g., Patagonia) have pledged PFAS phase-out; The North Face's silence suggests continued use of treated fabrics. No major safety recalls specific to this model are on record.

How it compares in its category

Large expedition duffels from mainstream outdoor brands typically use water-repellent coating-treated nylon or polyester. Premium alternatives like Patagonia offer PFAS-free water-repellent coating options (wax or silicone-based), but cost more. Budget duffels skip water-repellent coating entirely. This product sits in the mass-market segment where PFAS-treated water-repellent coating remains the cost-effective standard.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged skin contact with the interior or exterior; the water-repellent coating is not meant to be ingested or absorbed. Do not launder frequently or in hot water, as agitation and heat can degrade the coating and potentially increase leaching. Store in a dry place away from heat sources. When the water-shedding performance noticeably declines (after 5-10 years of heavy use), consider replacement rather than attempting to re-treat with aftermarket water-repellent coating products.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

PFAS in water-repellent coating

water-repellent coating treatment on nylon/polyester gear historically uses PFAS; The North Face does not disclose the specific chemistry. Long-chain PFAS bioaccumulate and are linked to health effects; shorter-chain replacements have less durability and limited safety data.

Possible

Coating degradation and microfiber shedding

As water-repellent coating wears, nylon/polyester fibers may shed into soil or water during washing. While not a direct toxicity hazard to the user, environmental microplastic pollution is a documented concern for synthetic duffels.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

No formaldehyde-based finishes are typically applied to nylon/polyester duffels (formaldehyde resins are more common in cotton apparel). The North Face uses standard synthetic textile finishing, which is not associated with formaldehyde off-gassing.

None known

Heavy metals in dyes or pigments

No recalls or reports of heavy metal contamination (lead, cadmium, antimony) in North Face nylon/polyester duffels. Modern synthetic fabric dyes are regulated in most markets and do not typically concentrate toxic metals.

None known

Flame retardant treatments

This duffel is not a sleeping bag, tent, or upholstered furniture and is not subject to flame retardant regulations. No such treatments are documented on expedition duffels in this category.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.