40/ 100
F
OverallF26/100
The North Face Base Camp Dry Bag Backpack

The North Face · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

The North Face Base Camp Dry Bag Backpack

F · High PFAS

water-repellent coating-treated backpack; PFAS content unknown, no brand disclosure.

Verdict: SkipDurable nylon pack with unknown water-repellent coating chemistry; no major recalls on record, but PFAS disclosure gap and industry-standard coatings warrant informed use.

The North Face does not publicly disclose PFAS use in this dry bag. Waterproof backpacks typically use water-repellent coating treatments that may contain PFAS. No third-party testing data available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon fabric with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Base Camp Dry Bag uses nylon fabric treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating coatings on outdoor textiles have historically relied on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve water-shedding performance, though some manufacturers now use non-fluorinated alternatives. The nylon itself is a synthetic polymer that resists degradation and does not typically leach harmful chemicals under normal use, but the surface treatment's chemistry remains the critical unknown here.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has not publicly disclosed the specific water-repellent coating chemistry used in this product or confirmed PFAS-free status. The brand has signed onto some sustainability initiatives but does not prominently advertise fluorine-free water repellency across its gear line. No significant recalls or safety violations related to this backpack have been publicly documented. This silence on water-repellent coating composition is typical of the outdoor apparel sector and does not indicate a safety failure, but rather an industry-wide gap in consumer transparency.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream outdoor backpacks use conventional fluorinated water-repellent coating treatments; this is standard practice and not a distinguishing factor. Competitors like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have begun disclosing PFAS-free alternatives, setting a transparency precedent that The North Face has not followed for this model. In terms of durability and water resistance, the Base Camp Dry Bag performs within expected norms for a premium pack, but buyers prioritizing PFAS avoidance may find explicit certifications elsewhere.

If you buy it

Store indoors in a cool, dry location away from direct sunlight to preserve water-repellent coating efficacy over time. Washing should be gentle and infrequent; when needed, use cool water and mild detergent, avoid fabric softeners and heat drying as these degrade water-repellent coatings. Do not apply aftermarket water-repellent coating sprays containing known PFAS unless you accept that trade-off explicitly. Replace when seams fail, zippers degrade, or water begins pooling on fabric rather than beading off; typical lifespan is 5-10 years with moderate use.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Reported

water-repellent coating degradation and reapplication

water-repellent coating finishes on nylon naturally wear down with washing and UV exposure. The North Face does not specify expected water-repellent coating lifespan on this product; users often resort to third-party fluorinated water-repellent coating treatments to restore water resistance, potentially introducing additional PFAS exposure.

Possible

Nylon microfiber shedding

Nylon textiles can shed microfibers during wear and washing, though backpack abrasion is less intensive than clothing. No specific shedding data exists for this model, but synthetic backpack materials do gradually degrade and release fibers into aquatic environments.

None known

Azo dyes in nylon coloring

The North Face uses standard industrial azo dyes for fabric coloring, which are regulated in the EU and US. No safety violations or hazardous dye incidents have been recorded for this product line.

None known

Hardware corrosion and metal leaching

Zippers, buckles, and D-rings are typically nickel-plated steel or aluminum. Under normal conditions these do not leach; however, prolonged exposure to salt water or sweat may cause corrosion over many years, though risk to users is minimal.

None known

Flame retardant additives in synthetic nylon

Nylon backpacks are not typically treated with halogenated flame retardants; the base polymer has moderate flame performance. No flame retardant treatments have been documented on this specific product.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.