40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
The North Face Base Camp Voyager Duffel

The North Face · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

The North Face Base Camp Voyager Duffel

F · High PFAS

Skip until The North Face discloses water-repellent coating chemistry used.

Verdict: SkipNylon duffel with undisclosed water-repellent coating finish poses unknown PFAS risk; no other established hazards in material or brand record, but transparency deficit warrants cautious use.

The North Face does not publicly disclose whether this duffel uses PFAS-based or PFAS-free water-repellent coating treatment. Without transparency on water-repellent coating, PFAS risk cannot be ruled out.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Base Camp Voyager is constructed from nylon fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. Nylon itself is a synthetic polymer with a long safety track record; the concern here is entirely the water-repellent coating, which historically has relied on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) to achieve water resistance. The North Face has not publicly disclosed whether this specific product uses legacy PFAS-based water-repellent coating, fluorine-free alternatives, or a hybrid formulation.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has not issued category-wide commitments to PFAS elimination comparable to competitors like Patagonia or Arc'teryx. The brand has not published testing results, material safety data sheets, or water-repellent coating chemistry transparency for consumer products. This silence is notable given that major apparel and gear makers have increasingly moved toward fluorine-free water-repellent coating systems since the mid-2010s due to regulatory pressure and public concern. Without disclosure, purchasers cannot assess the actual risk profile.

How it compares in its category

Within the travel duffel and gear-bag category, this is a mid-to-premium product with robust construction and reputation. Competitors including REI Co-op brands, Patagonia, and some newer direct-to-consumer manufacturers have begun disclosing water-repellent coating formulations or switching to PFAS-free alternatives; The North Face's silence puts it behind the transparency curve. Nylon duffels without water-repellent coatings eliminate water-repellent coating hazard entirely but sacrifice weather resistance.

If you buy it

Do not machine wash at high temperatures; hand rinse with cool water and mild soap, as hot water may release coating particles or degrade water-repellent coating performance. Avoid prolonged contact with skin or food if the bag is heavily worn or the coating is visibly peeling. Store in a dry place away from direct heat or UV, which can accelerate coating degradation over years. Consider requesting written water-repellent coating composition details from The North Face customer service before purchase to inform your decision.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS in water-repellent coating finish

The nylon fabric almost certainly carries a water-repellent coating; The North Face has not disclosed whether it contains legacy PFAS (PFOA, PFOS) or modern fluorine-free alternatives. Exposure risk during normal use is low but possible if coating degrades, and manufacturing/disposal may involve PFAS contamination of water systems.

Possible

Coating degradation and particulate shedding

Heavy use, washing, or exposure to UV and heat can cause the water-repellent coating layer to break down over 3-5 years. Shed coating microparticles could theoretically include fluorinated polymers, though health impact of inhalation or ingestion in this context is not quantified.

None known

Nylon polymer off-gassing

Nylon itself does not typically off-gas VOCs or formaldehyde resins under normal storage or use conditions. No recalls or published safety incidents specific to The North Face nylon duffels are on record.

None known

Dye or pigment contamination

The North Face uses mainstream commercial dyeing for nylon textiles. No specific azo dye or heavy metal contamination issues have been reported for this brand or product line. Standard textile industry compliance is assumed but not independently verified here.

None known

Antimony or flame retardant additives

Nylon duffels are not treated with flame retardants for regulatory compliance, and antimony is not a common additive in apparel-grade nylon. No evidence of such additives in The North Face products is on public record.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.