TaylorMade · Golf Balls & Golf Equipment
TaylorMade RBZ Tech Golf Glove
Golf glove water treatment unknown, TaylorMade offers no PFAS disclosure.
Golf gloves typically use water-repellent coating coatings to repel moisture, often PFAS-based. TaylorMade provides no transparency on treatment chemistry or PFAS content for this product.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather/synthetic with moisture-wicking treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The RBZ Tech combines leather (likely goat or sheep) with synthetic moisture-wicking fibers, treated with water-repellent finishes to enhance grip in humid conditions. Moisture-wicking treatments on textiles often rely on fluorochemical coatings (PFAS) or silicone-based polymers; TaylorMade has not disclosed which approach this glove uses. The leather component itself carries minimal toxicity risk if chrome-tanned (industry standard), though vegetable-tanned alternatives exist. Synthetic overlays may include polyester, nylon, or elastane, all chemically stable under normal hand-contact conditions.
The brand's record and disclosure
TaylorMade is a major golf equipment manufacturer with no public PFAS commitment or third-party certifications (e.g., bluesign, OEKO-TEX) listed for apparel lines. The company does not disclose chemical composition of moisture-wicking treatments on its glove product pages, which is standard industry opaqueness for sports brands. No recalls or safety controversies specific to RBZ gloves are on record. This silence on water-repellent chemistry is the core concern, as it prevents confirmation of PFAS avoidance.
How it compares in its category
Most golf gloves use leather/synthetic blends with some form of water-resistant finish; few brands disclose the chemistry. Certified alternatives (e.g., OEKO-TEX Standard 100 golf gloves from smaller makers) exist but are less widely available and often cost more. Premium brands like Callaway and Ping offer similar undisclosed treatments. The RBZ is competitively positioned on durability and grip, not on chemical transparency.
If you buy it
Hand-wash in cool water with mild soap to preserve the moisture-wicking coating and leather; avoid machine washing, which degrades both. Dry flat away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent synthetic fibers from warping. Replace when the grip surface becomes shiny or slippery, typically after 20-40 rounds of golf depending on frequency and climate. Avoid prolonged exposure to chlorine (pools) and harsh detergents, which can strip water-repellent treatments.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fluorochemical water-repellent coating (PFAS or similar)
Moisture-wicking golf gloves commonly use PFAS or other fluorochemical finishes; TaylorMade's specific formulation is undisclosed, making it impossible to confirm safety. Direct skin contact during wear is low-risk for leaching, but glove manufacturing wastewater poses environmental concern.
Synthetic fiber degradation under heat/friction
Polyester or nylon overlays on this glove are chemically stable during normal hand-contact use and do not release microplastics or volatiles under typical conditions. Risk is minimal unless glove is exposed to intense heat (>80°C), which is not a typical use scenario.
Leather tanning residues (chrome or vegetable)
Standard chrome tanning is considered safe for skin contact when properly processed; no contamination recalls exist for TaylorMade gloves. Chromium VI (hexavalent) risk is minimal in finished leather goods if tanning was compliant with EU/US standards.
Azo dyes or colorants in synthetic components
No specific azo dye concerns are documented for RBZ gloves. Modern golf glove dyes are generally restricted under apparel safety standards, though TaylorMade does not independently certify compliance.
Fragrance or finish adhesive off-gassing
Golf gloves do not typically contain added fragrance. Adhesives used to bond leather/synthetic layers are minimal and cure during manufacturing; no VOC off-gassing reports exist for this product line.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Equipment
Mizuno
Comp Glove
Leather/synthetic leather athletic glove
No known PFAS risk, but Mizuno discloses nothing about treatments.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Mizuno
Cabretta Leather Golf Glove
Cabretta leather, likely with standard leather tanning and finishing
Lower concern. Leather glove lacks water treatment trigger.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More golf balls & golf equipment grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.