40/ 100
F
OverallF28/100
Mizuno JPX Golf Glove

Mizuno · Golf Balls & Golf Equipment

Mizuno JPX Golf Glove

F · High PFAS

Golf glove with unknown water-resistant coating. No brand disclosure on PFAS.

Verdict: SkipSynthetic golf glove with undisclosed water-resistant coating (likely PFAS). No major hazards documented for material itself; brand silence on chemistry is the primary concern.

Mizuno JPX gloves likely use synthetic materials with water-repellent treatment, standard for golf gloves. Brand provides no PFAS transparency; coating chemistry remains undisclosed.

The safe swap

Mizuno Comp Glove

Mizuno

Mizuno Comp Glove

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather/microfiber with moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Mizuno JPX uses synthetic leather (likely polyurethane or polyester microfiber) rather than genuine leather, paired with a moisture-wicking treatment. Synthetic leather avoids heavy-metal tannage issues of genuine leather but typically requires a water-repellent finish to maintain grip and durability in wet conditions. Mizuno does not publicly disclose the composition of this finish, leaving the presence and type of water-resistant chemicals (potentially PFAS-based) unknown to consumers.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mizuno is a Japanese sporting-goods manufacturer with no established public commitment to PFAS phase-out or material transparency for apparel products. The company has not responded to major brand pressure campaigns on per- and polyfluorinated chemical disclosure in footwear and accessories. No recalls or safety controversies specific to this glove model are on record. This silence on chemistry, rather than active harm, is the defining issue.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves compete primarily on grip, moisture management, and durability. Synthetic-leather gloves dominate the market and typically offer better value and durability than leather alternatives, but nearly all use proprietary water-resistant coatings that are rarely disclosed. Mizuno's JPX is mid-range; premium brands (Titleist, Callaway) and budget brands (Winn) show similarly opaque coating chemistry. Few golf-glove makers currently publish PFAS-free certifications.

If you buy it

Wash the glove separately before first use to reduce any residual coating chemicals. Avoid machine drying and store in a dry environment to extend the water-resistant finish; repeated wetting and sun exposure degrade synthetic coatings over time. Replace when grip degrades or material cracks appear, typically after 6-12 months of regular use. If concerned about PFAS exposure, contact Mizuno directly requesting coating composition; lack of response strengthens the case for switching to a brand with verified PFAS-free claims.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Water-resistant coating composition (undisclosed)

Golf gloves require water-repellent coating treatment; Mizuno does not disclose whether this uses PFAS, fluorocarbon, or alternative chemistry. Skin contact during wear and hand perspiration may increase absorption risk if PFAS-based coatings are present.

None known

Synthetic microfiber off-gassing

Polyurethane and polyester microfiber do not typically release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or formaldehyde at significant levels after manufacturing, particularly in a thin-walled glove format. No documented issues for this product or material type.

Possible

Azo dyes in synthetic leather coloring

Synthetic leather gloves often use azo dyes for color, which may release carcinogenic amines under certain conditions (e.g., sweat, heat, UV). Mizuno does not specify whether dyes meet REACH or ZDHC restrictions. Risk is low during normal use but not ruled out.

Possible

Coating degradation and microparticle release

As the water-resistant finish wears, it may shed small particles into skin contact. No studies on golf-glove coating shedding exist, but synthetic textiles in general can shed fibers and coating fragments under friction and flexing during grip use.

None known

Formaldehyde resin finish (secondary concern)

Some synthetic-leather production uses formaldehyde-based resins for durability bonding. Mizuno's manufacturing standards are not publicly detailed. Residual formaldehyde would typically be low after molding and cure, and washing before use further reduces it.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Equipment

Mizuno Comp Glove

Mizuno

Comp Glove

Leather/synthetic leather athletic glove

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

No known PFAS risk, but Mizuno discloses nothing about treatments.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Mizuno Cabretta Leather Golf Glove

Mizuno

Cabretta Leather Golf Glove

Cabretta leather, likely with standard leather tanning and finishing

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. Leather glove lacks water treatment trigger.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & golf equipment grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.