40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
TaylorMade Men's 2025 Tour Preferred Motion Golf Glove

TaylorMade · Golf Balls & Golf Equipment

TaylorMade Men's 2025 Tour Preferred Motion Golf Glove

F · High PFAS

Golf glove with water treatment; PFAS disclosure absent. Skip if concerned.

Verdict: SkipLeather golf glove with undisclosed water treatment (likely PFAS); no major brand controversies on record, but water-resistant coating requires transparency.

Golf gloves typically receive water-repellent coating or water-resistant treatments that may contain PFAS. TaylorMade provides no public disclosure of treatment chemistry or PFAS status.

The safe swap

Mizuno Comp Glove

Mizuno

Mizuno Comp Glove

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather and synthetic leather with water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

TaylorMade's 2025 Tour Preferred Motion glove combines genuine leather (typically cabretta or sheepskin in premium golf gloves) with synthetic overlays for durability and grip. The water-resistant treatment applied to the leather and synthetics is where chemical concern concentrates; golf glove manufacturers routinely use water-repellent finishes, and the specific chemistry is rarely disclosed to consumers. Leather itself is stable and non-toxic when untreated, but the coating process introduces potential exposure during manufacture and minor leaching during use, especially if the glove becomes wet or is cleaned aggressively.

The brand's record and disclosure

TaylorMade (Callaway Golf subsidiary) has no public record of PFAS or chemical-coating transparency statements for apparel or gloves. The brand does not publish materials certifications (e.g., REACH, Bluesign, or GOTS) for golf gloves in available documentation. No major recalls or health controversies linked to Tour Preferred gloves have been reported. This silence is typical for the golf equipment category, where chemical disclosure lags behind footwear and textiles brands.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves occupy a narrow category with few transparent competitors. Premium alternatives like Callaway, Ping, and Titleist typically apply similar water-resistant treatments without disclosure. Budget gloves use cheaper synthetics with heavier chemical coatings; premium leather gloves like TaylorMade tend to use less aggressive finishes but still do not disclose composition. None of the major golf glove brands publish third-party testing or PFAS commitments, making this product representative of standard industry practice rather than an outlier.

If you buy it

Wash the glove with mild soap and cool water after use, especially on humid or rainy days, to minimize coating degradation and any potential leaching during extended contact with sweat. Avoid machine washing and do not expose to heat (dishwasher, dryer, direct sunlight for extended periods), which can break down the water-resistant finish prematurely and concentrate residual chemicals. Replace the glove when the grip surface wears smooth or the leather cracks, typically every 6-12 months depending on frequency of play. Store dry in a breathable pouch to prevent mold and preserve coating integrity.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Water-resistant coating (likely PFAS or PFAS-alternative chemicals)

Golf gloves are treated with water-repellent coating finishes to maintain grip in wet conditions. TaylorMade does not disclose the chemistry; industry standard is PFAS-based water-repellent coating, though some manufacturers now use fluorine-free alternatives. Direct skin contact is continuous during wear, and sweat can slightly mobilize coating residues.

None known

Heavy metals in synthetic leather dyes

No recalls or test reports specific to TaylorMade Tour Preferred gloves. Synthetic overlays (polyester/PU) can carry trace metals (e.g., cadmium in pigments) if dyes are not regulated; TaylorMade has not published dye certification for this product.

None known

Azo dyes in leather or synthetic components

Genuine cabretta leather and synthetic fabrics used in golf gloves may contain azo dyes, which can release carcinogenic amines under degradation or prolonged sweat exposure. No specific testing data available for this product; risk is low but unquantified.

None known

Formaldehyde in leather tanning or synthetic finish resins

Leather tanning typically uses chromium salts (low formaldehyde risk) rather than formaldehyde-based methods, but water-resistant resin coatings may contain trace formaldehyde. No certification or test report available for this glove.

Possible

Coating degradation and particle shedding with age

As the glove ages and the water-resistant coating wears, small particles or degraded finish fragments may be inhaled or ingested via hand-to-mouth contact. This is a use-life hazard rather than an acute one; replacement when grip wears noticeably mitigates exposure.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Equipment

Mizuno Comp Glove

Mizuno

Comp Glove

Leather/synthetic leather athletic glove

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

No known PFAS risk, but Mizuno discloses nothing about treatments.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Mizuno Cabretta Leather Golf Glove

Mizuno

Cabretta Leather Golf Glove

Cabretta leather, likely with standard leather tanning and finishing

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. Leather glove lacks water treatment trigger.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & golf equipment grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.