Mizuno · Golf Balls & Golf Equipment
Mizuno Tour Golf Gloves
Golf glove with likely water-resistant treatment, Mizuno discloses nothing about PFAS.
Golf gloves typically use synthetic leather with water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS, though specifics vary. Mizuno provides no PFAS information; contact them directly for treatment details.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Synthetic leather/microfiber with moisture-wicking treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Mizuno Tour Golf Gloves use synthetic leather (microfiber polyurethane or similar engineered material) rather than genuine leather, paired with moisture-wicking treatments to manage sweat during play. The synthetic base itself is chemically stable and does not leach heavy metals or plasticizers under normal hand-contact conditions. However, the moisture-wicking finish is almost certainly fluorochemical-based (PFAS family) to achieve water and sweat repellence; Mizuno has not disclosed the specific formulation or PFAS type used.
The brand's record and disclosure
Mizuno is a major Japanese sporting-goods manufacturer with no publicly available PFAS disclosure policy or third-party certification (e.g., OEKO-TEX, Bluesign) for its apparel line. The company has not issued statements addressing PFAS in gloves or other textiles. This silence is typical among golf-gear makers, but it limits ability to verify whether PFAS use meets stricter standards or regulatory trends in the EU and some US states.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves universally rely on synthetic or leather uppers with water-resistant treatments; there are no major competitors marketing PFAS-free or certified low-fluorochemical golf gloves. Mizuno's Tour line is mid-to-premium priced and generally well-regarded for durability and grip. Functionally, it sits in line with standard offerings from Callaway, TaylorMade, and Footjoy, all of which also do not disclose PFAS or pursue fluorochemical-free alternatives.
If you buy it
Wash hands after use to minimize skin contact with the moisture-wicking coating. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight, which could degrade the synthetic leather and release residual chemicals. Replace gloves every 12-24 months of regular use, as the water-resistant finish degrades with washing and weathering. Avoid machine washing; spot-clean with mild soap and air-dry to extend life and preserve the treatment integrity.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fluorinated water-resistant treatment (PFAS family)
Moisture-wicking finishes on synthetic golf gloves almost universally use PFAS (such as Teflon-type coating or polyfluorinated polyurethanes) to repel sweat and water. Mizuno does not disclose the specific class or concentration. Dermal absorption from gloves is minimal, but manufacturingwastewater and end-of-life disposal pose environmental persistence risk.
Synthetic leather degradation and off-gassing
Polyurethane microfiber can shed volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during early use and when exposed to heat or sweat. The level is typically low in established brands, but Mizuno does not publish off-gassing test results. Risk is minimal during normal wear but may increase if gloves are left in hot vehicles or near direct heat.
Azo dyes in colorants
No recalls or testing data document azo-dye contamination in Mizuno golf gloves. Synthetic leather colorants in major brands generally comply with international textile safety standards (e.g., REACH, CPSIA), though Mizuno's supply chain transparency is not publicly verifiable.
Allergens from synthetic polymers and treatment residues
Individuals with sensitivity to polyurethane or synthetic materials may experience contact dermatitis; this is rare but more likely if the water-resistant coating breaks down or accumulates residue from sweat and dirt. Patch testing is not standard for golf gloves, so sensitization risk cannot be precisely quantified.
Microplastic shedding
Synthetic microfiber does not inherently shed microplastics during wear or laundering in the way that loose fleece or knit synthetics do. However, as the polyurethane coating degrades over time, fine particles may be released; no field data exist for golf gloves specifically.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 55% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Equipment
Mizuno
Comp Glove
Leather/synthetic leather athletic glove
No known PFAS risk, but Mizuno discloses nothing about treatments.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Mizuno
Cabretta Leather Golf Glove
Cabretta leather, likely with standard leather tanning and finishing
Lower concern. Leather glove lacks water treatment trigger.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More golf balls & golf equipment grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.