20/ 100
F
OverallF8/100
Outdoor Products Dry Bag Valuables

Outdoor Products · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Bags

Outdoor Products Dry Bag Valuables

F · High PFAS

Dry bag likely has waterproof treatment; PFAS details absent, skip.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof dry bags require PFAS-free verification; polyurethane/PVC coating durability and leaching profile unknown for this brand.

Outdoor Products does not disclose waterproof coating chemistry. Dry bags typically use water-repellent coating or PFC treatments, but this brand provides no transparency on PFAS risk.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyurethane or PVC coated fabric, waterproof treatment unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This bag uses polyurethane or PVC-coated fabric to achieve waterproofing. The coating itself is the functional barrier, but unspecified treatment chemicals (likely fluorochemical water repellents or alternative water-repellent coating finishes) may be present. Polyurethane and PVC are not inherently toxic polymers, but coating adhesion quality and any plasticizer additives (particularly in PVC) directly affect whether chemicals leach into stored items or degrade over time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Outdoor Products does not publicly disclose waterproof treatment chemistry or provide PFAS-free certification for this model. The brand has no known major product safety recalls related to toxic leaching, but absence of transparency on coating composition is a weak signal. No independent certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign) are listed for this product, which is standard for budget outdoor gear.

How it compares in its category

Dry bags are a lower-exposure category than food-contact items, since contents are typically valuables (electronics, documents) rather than food. However, many premium brands now explicitly state PFAS-free treatments or use wax-based or silicone-based coatings. Budget dry bags from unspecified brands often still use legacy fluorochemical finishes. This product sits in the mid-market with no competitive advantage in material transparency.

If you buy it

Store only valuables and non-porous items (phones, keys, documents). Do not use for food or prolonged skin contact. Avoid exposing the bag to heat above 60°C or direct sunlight for extended periods, as coating degradation accelerates chemical release. Inspect the seams and coating annually; replace if peeling, cracking, or discoloration appears. Wipe interior with a dry cloth before storing sensitive electronics to prevent moisture and off-gassing accumulation.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Coating degradation and unknown leachables

Polyurethane and PVC coatings can degrade over 2-5 years with UV and heat exposure. The specific resin chemistry and plasticizers in Outdoor Products' coating are not disclosed, so potential leaching of phthalates (in PVC) or adhesive residues cannot be ruled out, though actual risk depends on storage conditions and contents.

Possible

Fluorochemical water repellent residue

Waterproof treatments commonly use water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finishes; if this product uses fluorochemical-based water-repellent coating, residual PFAS on the fabric surface could transfer to stored items. Brand silence on treatment type prevents confirmation.

Possible

Off-gassing from polyurethane

Lower-cost polyurethane coatings may release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during initial use or when stored in warm conditions. This poses minimal hazard to skin (bag is external) but could affect enclosed electronics if bag is sealed in a hot space.

None known

Microplastic shedding from coating

Polyurethane and PVC coatings can shed microplastics if abraded or degraded, though not confirmed for this brand. Risk is highest if the bag is heavily used with rough contents or stored in direct sunlight for years.

None known

No formaldehyde or azo dyes concern

The fabric substrate may use standard polyester or nylon, which can contain formaldehyde resins or azo dyes if not finished with formaldehyde-free processes. However, dry bags are not in sustained skin contact, making this a very low-priority exposure route.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 42% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Bags

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated5 flags

Toolbox, not garment. Check product specs for water-repellent coating.

Risky category by default

More waterproof outdoor gear bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.