20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
Marmot Kompressor Comet Backpack

Marmot · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Bags

Marmot Kompressor Comet Backpack

F · High PFAS

Backpack uses water-repellent coating treatment; Marmot silent on PFAS composition.

Verdict: SkipNylon backpack with water-repellent coating poses low established chemical risk, but Marmot's silence on PFAS composition and lack of third-party testing warrant cautious use and regular inspection.

Marmot's Kompressor Comet uses durable nylon with water-repellent durability treatment, typical in outdoor gear. The brand makes no public disclosure about PFAS content or water-repellent coating chemistry, limiting confidence in safety assessment.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon fabric with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Kompressor Comet uses nylon fabric treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating. water-repellent coating treatments historically contained long-chain PFAS, though many brands have shifted to fluorine-free alternatives in recent years; Marmot has not disclosed which type is used here. Nylon itself is stable and does not leach chemicals during normal use, but the coating's composition and longevity under UV and mechanical stress are the primary concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Marmot is owned by Cascade Designs (a subsidiary of Helen of Troy) and has not made public commitments to PFAS phase-out or published ingredient disclosures for their water-repellent coating treatments. The brand does not appear on major PFAS-committed manufacturer lists (e.g., ZDHC Gateway certifications or bluesign standards). This silence means consumers cannot verify whether the backpack uses legacy PFAS or safer alternatives. No recalls or documented chemical safety incidents specific to Marmot backpacks are on record.

How it compares in its category

Most technical backpack brands use some form of water-repellent coating; Marmot's approach is standard for the price point and performance tier. Competitor brands like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have begun disclosing PFAS phase-outs or use certified fluorine-free water-repellent coating (e.g., Bluesign-approved coatings). The Kompressor Comet sits in a mid-market space where transparency lags behind premium outdoor brands. For a backpack at this price and function, the lack of disclosure is a relative weakness.

If you buy it

Store the backpack in a cool, dry place away from prolonged direct sunlight, which can degrade the water-repellent coating over time. Wash with cool water and mild soap if needed; avoid machine washing and heat drying, which can strip the coating and potentially release particles. Inspect the exterior regularly for peeling, cracking, or discoloration of the water-repellent coating layer, which signals coating breakdown. If the water-repellent coating noticeably fails (water no longer beads), consider retiring the bag or seeking re-treatment from a certified service that uses PFAS-free products.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating degradation and particle release

Fluorinated water-repellent coating coatings can degrade through wear, UV exposure, and washing, potentially releasing microparticles or residual coating compounds. No specific testing of Marmot's coating durability or particle shedding is publicly available, but mechanical wear of nylon-based technical fabrics is well-documented.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in nylon or finish treatments

Nylon fabric manufacturing can involve formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance or finish stabilization. Marmot does not disclose use of such agents in this product; no recalls or complaints attributable to formaldehyde are on record for this backpack model.

None known

Azo dyes in fabric coloring

If the nylon is dyed with azo colorants, they can release aromatic amines under sweat or alkaline conditions, though this risk is low for backpack exterior fabrics. No testing or disclosure from Marmot regarding dye composition is available.

Possible

Contact dermatitis from water-repellent coating or dye residues

Residual coating or dye compounds on new fabrics can cause skin irritation in sensitive individuals, particularly if worn against bare skin. Standard practice is to wash the backpack or wear layers before extended contact.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments (if exterior print/patches present)

Printed logos or decorative patches on outdoor gear can contain heavy metal pigments (e.g., cadmium-based inks). The Kompressor Comet's printed branding has not been tested; no public recalls exist, but disclosure is absent.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Bags

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated5 flags

Toolbox, not garment. Check product specs for water-repellent coating.

Risky category by default

More waterproof outdoor gear bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.