Outdoor Products · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Bags
Outdoor Products All Purpose Dry Sacks
Skip until brand discloses waterproof coating chemistry.
Dry sacks use waterproof treatment typical for outdoor gear, but brand provides no information about coating type or PFAS content. Avoid without transparency on water-repellent coating chemistry.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Fabric with waterproof water-repellent coating, type unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Outdoor Products All Purpose Dry Sacks are constructed from a fabric base (likely nylon or polyester) treated with a waterproof water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating of unspecified chemistry. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS compounds to achieve water resistance, though some manufacturers have shifted to PFAS-free alternatives in recent years. The brand has not publicly disclosed which chemistry it uses, making the actual hazard profile of the coating unknown without direct testing or brand statement.
The brand's record and disclosure
Outdoor Products maintains a minimal public stance on chemical composition and safety certifications. No major recalls or safety controversies specific to this dry sack line are documented in public records. The brand has not released statements about PFAS-free coatings, fluorine-free waterproofing, or third-party certifications (such as STANDARD 100 or Bluesign approval), which are increasingly expected for apparel and gear in this category.
How it compares in its category
Dry sacks occupy a niche in outdoor gear where waterproofing is essential but exposure is typically external and short-term. Competitors like Sea to Summit and Patagonia have begun disclosing water-repellent coating chemistry or committing to PFAS reduction, while other budget brands remain silent. Outdoor Products' lack of transparency places it in the middle-to-lower disclosure tier; many outdoor retailers now flag non-compliant gear and some brands have already eliminated older PFAS-based water-repellent coating formulations.
If you buy it
Dry sacks are low-contact external gear with minimal ingestion or inhalation risk. Store in a cool, dry location away from direct heat (do not dry-clean or tumble-dry at high temperature, which can degrade coatings and release volatiles). Avoid prolonged skin contact with wet coating if you have sensitive skin, and rinse hands after extended handling. Inspect seams and coating for wear annually; replace if waterproofing visibly degrades or flakes, as this signals breakdown of the water-repellent coating layer.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
water-repellent coating volatilization (thermal)
If the coating contains legacy PFAS or other volatile additives, exposure risk is low under normal storage and use but could increase with heat, direct sunlight, or mechanical stress. No specific thermal data for this product model is available.
Azo dyes in fabric base
No documented azo dye concerns or safety violations reported for Outdoor Products dry sacks. Nylon and polyester bases are typically low-risk for azo dye contamination, though certification data would confirm this.
Antimony in polyester (if used)
If the fabric base is 100% polyester, antimony catalysts may be present at trace levels, but external-use dry sacks present negligible skin or ingestion risk. No recalls or testing data specific to this product indicate elevated antimony.
Formaldehyde-based resin finishes
Waterproof coatings and fabric finishes may contain formaldehyde releasers, but no public safety alerts or testing results for Outdoor Products dry sacks document this hazard. Off-gassing from external gear is minimal given low surface contact.
Coating adhesion and microparticle shedding over time
As water-repellent coating coatings degrade with age and washing, microscopic particles may shed into water or soil during outdoor use. Long-term environmental impact is poorly characterized, and this product carries no durability or shedding warranty in public materials.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Bags
Marmot
Tool Box
Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified
Toolbox, not garment. Check product specs for water-repellent coating.
⚠Risky category by default
More waterproof outdoor gear bags grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.