20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Marmot Kompressor Meteor 22 Backpack

Marmot · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Bags

Marmot Kompressor Meteor 22 Backpack

F · High PFAS

Popular outdoor brand, water-repellent coating likely fluorinated; PFAS stance undisclosed.

Verdict: SkipNylon backpack with undisclosed water-repellent coating; no formaldehyde or azo dye reports, but fluorinated water treatment likely present and unconfirmed. Safe with informed use.

Marmot Kompressor uses durable nylon with water-repellent coating finishing typical in outdoor backpacks. No public PFAS disclosure or testing data available; water-repellent coating coatings often contain PFAS. Contact brand for specifics on treatment chemistry.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Kompressor Meteor 22 is constructed primarily from nylon fabric treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating treatments on outdoor gear are typically fluorinated compounds applied to the surface to shed water without creating a waterproof membrane that traps moisture. Nylon itself is stable and does not off-gas formaldehyde or volatile organic compounds at normal temperatures, but the chemical composition and toxicity of the water-repellent coating treatment applied to this specific product remains unconfirmed by public data.

The brand's record and disclosure

Marmot does not publicly disclose whether its water-repellent coating treatments are fluorinated or fluorine-free alternatives. The company has made no formal commitment to eliminating PFAS from its product line, unlike some competing outdoor brands (Arc'teryx, Patagonia) that have begun transitioning to non-fluorinated water repellents. No recalls, formaldehyde violations, or heavy metal contamination have been documented for Marmot backpacks in consumer safety databases.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream outdoor backpacks in this price range use nylon with fluorinated water-repellent coating, making the Kompressor Meteor 22 typical rather than distinctive. Premium alternatives from brands with transparent PFAS reduction programs (Patagonia, REI Co-op) increasingly use fluorine-free water-repellent coating or natural water resistance, but at higher cost. Budget alternatives often use polyester, which carries different environmental hazards; nylon is generally preferred for durability and does not degrade into microplastics more readily than polyester under normal use.

If you buy it

Wash and dry the backpack only as needed to preserve the water-repellent coating; heat exposure (hot water, high-temperature machine drying) can degrade water repellency and potentially accelerate leaching of coating chemicals. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to minimize UV breakdown of nylon fibers and the water-repellent coating layer. If the water-repellent finish visibly degrades or ceases to work, consider replacement rather than aggressive re-treatment, which may apply additional chemical layers. No special precautions are needed during normal use; the water-repellent coating is not volatile or dermal hazard under typical handling.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

Fluorinated water-repellent coating (surface treatment)

Nylon backpacks routinely use fluorinated water repellents; Marmot does not specify which type. Fluorinated water-repellent coating coatings may shed PFAS into water during washing or degradation, though actual migration from a finished backpack during use is minimal. Graded separately under PFAS assessment.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in textiles

No formaldehyde-based finishing resins are standard in nylon water-repellent coating backpack production. Formaldehyde hazards are typical of cellulose fabrics (cotton, rayon) and some synthetic blend wrinkle finishes, not pure nylon with water-repellent coatings.

None known

Azo dyes in nylon coloring

No recalls or reports of azo dye use in Marmot backpacks. Azo dyes are controlled in EU markets and generally avoided by major outdoor brands; this product shows no documentation of dye-related contamination or heavy metal leaching.

None known

Antimony in polyester (not applicable here)

The Kompressor Meteor 22 is nylon-based, not polyester. Antimony is a catalyst residue in polyester production, not relevant to this product.

Possible

Coating degradation and leaching over time

As the water-repellent coating ages or is exposed to washing, UV light, or abrasion, the fluorinated or alternative water-repellent chemicals may shed into the environment or wash water. Long-term migration into skin contact is low, but washing frequency and water disposal practices affect total PFAS release.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Bags

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated5 flags

Toolbox, not garment. Check product specs for water-repellent coating.

Risky category by default

More waterproof outdoor gear bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.