40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
Osprey Dry Sack w/ Window

Osprey · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Osprey Dry Sack w/ Window

F · High PFAS

Dry sack waterproofing unknown; Osprey provides no PFAS disclosure.

Verdict: SkipDry sack with unknown PFAS waterproofing and no brand disclosure; material itself low-risk if handled properly, but durability and coating longevity unverified.

Osprey Dry Sacks use waterproof coatings whose chemistry is not publicly disclosed. No PFAS claims or certifications available from the brand.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester fabric with waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Osprey Dry Sacks use nylon or polyester base fabric with a waterproof coating applied to achieve water resistance. The coating chemistry is not publicly disclosed by Osprey. Nylon and polyester themselves are stable polymers with low leaching risk under normal conditions; the risk centers on the waterproofing agent (likely but unconfirmed to be fluorochemical-based per the PFAS assessment) and whether the coating degrades over time, potentially releasing microparticles or coating fragments into contents.

The brand's record and disclosure

Osprey Packs is a subsidiary of Pentland Group and does not publicly disclose PFAS use or phase-out commitments specific to dry sacks or waterproof gear. The company has not published a restricted substances list or PFAS transparency statement available in public records. Without proactive disclosure, the waterproofing chemistry must be assumed unverified, which is typical for outdoor fabric suppliers but inconsistent with leading brands now adopting fluorine-free water repellency.

How it compares in its category

Dry sacks are a lower-risk product category compared to cookware or cosmetics because contact with food or skin is minimal and incidental. Most competitors (including budget brands) use similar nylon/polyester with undisclosed coatings. Osprey's reputation for durability is solid, but lack of PFAS communication places it in the middle of the market; brands like Patagonia have moved toward PFAS-free alternatives in similar gear, setting a higher standard.

If you buy it

Store dry sacks away from heat sources and direct sunlight to slow coating degradation. Do not machine wash; hand rinse with cool water and mild soap if needed, as abrasion can damage the waterproof layer and release microparticles. Inspect annually for peeling, cracking, or discoloration of the coating; if visible wear is present, consider replacement to avoid coating fragments contaminating stored contents. Avoid storing items that will contact the coating directly for extended periods if concerned about coating leachates.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Microplastics from coating degradation

Nylon/polyester fabrics with applied waterproof coatings can shed particles as the coating flexes, creases, and ages. Risk is heightened if the sack is used heavily or stored in high-temperature environments, but no recalls or testing data specific to Osprey dry sacks are on record.

None known

Polymer leaching under stress

Nylon and polyester base materials themselves do not typically leach monomers or additives under normal storage conditions. Risk is contingent on the waterproof coating chemistry, which is not disclosed.

Possible

Coating adhesion failure

Waterproof coatings can delaminate or peel over time, especially under UV exposure or repeated folding and unfolding. This does not pose direct toxicity but can compromise the product's function and create loose coating debris.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in fabric treatments

Osprey does not disclose use of formaldehyde-releasing resins in fabric finishing. Nylon and polyester can be treated with formaldehyde-based flame retardants or wrinkle resistance agents, but no specific reports or certifications for Osprey dry sacks are available.

None known

Chemical off-gassing from dyes or printing

The window panel (if printed or dyed) could off-gas volatile compounds initially, especially if sealed in a dry sack. No specific test data or customer reports of odor or respiratory effects are on record for this product.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.