40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
Nike PD Long

Nike Golf · Golf Balls & Equipment

Nike PD Long

F · High PFAS

Limited public PFAS info on golf balls. Avoid if concerned.

Verdict: SkipGolf balls pose minimal chemical hazard in normal use; PFAS uncertainty is the main concern if you prioritize synthetic-chemical avoidance.

Nike PD Long is a golf ball with synthetic polymer construction. Nike discloses no PFAS position; typical golf balls may use Teflon-family coating in covers, but no lab data confirms it here.

The safe swap

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Nike Golf

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Golf ball, synthetic polymer core/cover

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Nike PD Long uses a synthetic polymer core (likely a ionomeric or rubber-based compound) wrapped in a synthetic cover material, typically polyurethane or similar elastomer. Golf balls are designed for impact resistance and durability, so their polymer matrices are heavily cross-linked to withstand compression and abrasion. During normal play, these materials do not leach into skin or food; chemical release risk is minimal unless the ball degrades severely or is heated to very high temperatures.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has faced scrutiny over manufacturing transparency and PFAS use in apparel and footwear, but has published limited specific data on golf ball chemistry. The company does not disclose PFAS status for the PD Long specifically. No product recalls or documented chemical safety incidents are on record for this golf ball model. Nike's silence on synthetic-polymer composition is typical for the golf equipment category, where proprietary blends are common.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls across major brands (Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade, Bridgestone) all use similar synthetic polymer architectures with comparable transparency gaps. The PD Long is mid-market in terms of disclosed material information. Unlike apparel or water bottles, golf balls have no direct skin contact during normal use and are not heated or microwaved, reducing exposure pathways. Most hazard concerns in this category revolve around PFAS in performance coatings rather than core toxicity.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to slow polymer degradation and minimize any potential leaching from aged materials. Do not expose to temperatures above 140 degrees Fahrenheit (60 C). Replace balls if the cover develops deep cracks, cuts, or visible delamination, as damaged materials may release fragments during play. Wash hands after handling heavily used or visibly deteriorated balls, though chemical exposure during normal play is negligible.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS in performance coatings

Golf balls often use Teflon-family coating or PFAS-containing top coatings for water resistance and durability. Nike has not disclosed PFAS content for the PD Long; the 40/100 PFAS grade reflects this opacity rather than confirmed presence.

Possible

Polymer degradation and microplastic shed

Extended outdoor use and UV exposure degrade synthetic covers, potentially releasing microplastic particles during play. This is a material-class risk across all golf balls, not Nike-specific, but occurs gradually over hundreds of rounds.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments and inks

Golf ball surface printing and coloration use industrial inks and dyes. No documented cases of lead or cadmium contamination in Nike PD Long or peer brands have been reported; brief skin contact during play poses minimal risk.

None known

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

New golf balls may emit trace VOCs during manufacturing off-gassing for the first few days of storage. This dissipates rapidly and is not a concern for normal retail purchase and use.

None known

Allergen risk from synthetic polymers

Synthetic elastomers used in golf ball covers are non-allergenic in the general population. No documented contact dermatitis cases linked to Nike PD Long or similar balls are on record.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Nike Golf

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Synthetic rubber/elastomer golf ball core and cover

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Golf balls pose minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nike Golf Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Nike Golf

Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Rubber, synthetic polymer core; urethane/elastomer cover

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Golf balls present minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nike PD Soft

Nike Golf

Nike PD Soft

Surlyn ionomer cover, soft polymer core

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Golf ball with standard polymers, lower concern than coated apparel.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.