85/ 100
B
OverallB81/100
Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Nike Golf · Golf Balls & Equipment

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

B · Low PFAS

Lower concern. Golf balls pose minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Verdict: BuyGolf balls present minimal consumer safety concern; synthetic rubber/elastomer construction carries no established hazards under normal use conditions.

Nike does not disclose PFAS use in Power Distance balls. Golf balls have limited skin contact and are not food/water contact items. Standard synthetic rubber compounds typically pose lower PFAS risk than water-repellent coatings.

Shop Nike Golf on Amazon →

Material

Synthetic rubber/elastomer golf ball core and cover

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Nike Power Distance balls use a synthetic rubber or elastomer core wrapped in a synthetic cover layer, a standard construction for modern golf balls. These materials are chosen for durability and performance, not chemical utility, meaning they do not require reactive additives like those found in plastics for food contact or thermal coatings. Unlike cookware or textiles, golf balls do not contact skin or ingestion pathways during normal use, and the elastomer matrix itself is chemically inert once cured.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has not publicly disclosed material safety data or third-party testing results specific to Power Distance golf balls. The broader Nike brand has faced scrutiny over labor and chemical manufacturing practices in footwear, but golf balls represent a minor product line with no established safety controversies or recalls on record. Nike's silence on PFAS in this category is typical for golf equipment manufacturers and does not indicate a known problem.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls across all major brands (Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade, Bridgestone) use similar synthetic elastomer and polymer constructions with no meaningful safety differentiation. The category itself carries negligible chemical exposure risk compared to food-contact items or textiles worn daily. Performance and durability vary among brands, but material safety profiles are functionally equivalent.

If you buy it

Store balls in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or UV exposure for extended periods, as elastomer can degrade over decades if subjected to extreme conditions, though this does not pose a health risk. Golf balls require no special handling or maintenance beyond normal cleaning with water and mild soap. Replace when the cover becomes visibly cut or scuffed, which affects performance rather than safety. No inhalation, dermal, or ingestion risk exists under standard play conditions.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Elastomer degradation and off-gassing

Synthetic rubber and elastomer cores are chemically stable once vulcanized and do not emit volatile organic compounds under normal storage or use temperatures. No established off-gassing concerns exist for cured golf ball materials.

None known

Heavy metals or pigment contaminants

Golf ball covers use synthetic dyes and pigments in minimal quantities; no lead, cadmium, or antimony content has been reported or is typical in elastomer-based sports equipment. The closed, non-porous structure limits leaching pathways.

Possible

Microplastic shedding

Repeated impact wear on synthetic covers can generate small plastic particles; however, these remain localized to the playing surface and turf and do not constitute an ingestion or direct inhalation risk during play. Environmental fate of shed microplastics from golf balls is not well characterized but is a recognized concern for water courses adjacent to golf courses.

None known

Skin contact sensitization

Cured elastomer and polymer surfaces do not contain known skin sensitizers or reactive allergens. Occasional hand contact during play poses no documented dermatological risk.

None known

Formaldehyde or chemical residues in manufacturing

No recalls, test results, or public reports indicate residual formaldehyde or uncured chemical additives in finished Nike Power Distance balls. Post-manufacturing curing and quality control minimize exposure to volatile manufacturing byproducts.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.