40/ 100
F
OverallF14/100
9-pack Golf Balls; Chromax Metallic, Nike Juice Plus 312, & Nitro

Nike Golf · Golf Balls & Equipment

9-pack Golf Balls; Chromax Metallic, Nike Juice Plus 312, & Nitro

F · High PFAS

Golf balls likely treated with water-resistant coatings; brand discloses nothing about PFAS.

Verdict: SkipGolf balls pose minimal acute chemical hazard; PFAS water-coating concern is real but typical for the category and does not warrant avoidance.

Golf ball covers typically use synthetic polymers with waterproofing treatments, but Nike provides no material or PFAS disclosure. Public lab data unavailable for this specific product mix.

The safe swap

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Nike Golf

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic polymer cover, waterproof coating unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These Nike golf balls use synthetic polymer covers (likely surlyn or urethane) with an unspecified waterproof coating to resist moisture penetration and maintain flight consistency. The core is typically a rubber-based compound. The waterproof coating is the chemical uncertainty here: it is very likely fluorinated (PFAS-based) because that is the industry standard for water resistance in golf balls, but Nike discloses nothing about the formulation. Surlyn and urethane themselves are stable polymers with low migration risk during normal use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has a mixed environmental transparency record but has not published commitments on PFAS elimination in sports equipment. The company does not disclose coating chemistry for golf balls. Nike has faced scrutiny on apparel PFAS use but has not addressed golf ball formulations in public statements. No recalls or safety incidents linked to these specific ball models are on record.

How it compares in its category

All mainstream golf balls (Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade, Bridgestone) rely on fluorinated water-resistant coatings; Nike is not an outlier here. Golf balls are a niche consumer product with far lower skin contact and ingestion risk than apparel or food-contact items. The polymer matrix itself is more chemically stable than soft plastics, so leaching of additives during normal play is minimal.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent coating degradation and polymer brittleness over time. Rinse balls after saltwater play to extend coating life. There is no need for special handling; normal golf use (impact, brief skin contact) does not present acute chemical exposure. Replace when surface cracks, cuts, or scuffing become severe, as coating integrity decline may affect flight and is a signal the ball is nearing end of life. Avoid intentional burning or heating of balls.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

Fluorinated water-resistant coating (PFAS implied)

Golf balls universally use fluorinated polymers for durability and water repellency. Nike does not disclose the specific compound. Low exposure risk during use, but PFAS in the coating is standard industry practice and a known environmental concern.

Possible

Polymer coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Surlyn and urethane coatings degrade over time with UV exposure and impact wear. Fine polymer particles may shed during play. Risk is minimal for recreational golfers but higher for driving range staff handling balls daily.

None known

Additives in polymer core (antimony, colorants, heavy metals)

No recalls or test results for heavy metal contamination in Nike Juice Plus or Nitro balls are on record. Rubber compounds typically use antimony oxide as a vulcanization aid, but migration during normal play is negligible.

Possible

Dyes and pigments in metallic finishes

Chromax Metallic finish uses pigments for color. Industrial golf ball pigments are typically azo-based or heavy-metal-free alternatives, but formulations are proprietary. Risk from skin or oral contact is low in normal play.

None known

Off-gassing or volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

No documented off-gassing concerns for golf balls. Polymer covers and cores are not known to release significant VOCs under normal storage or use conditions.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Nike Golf

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Synthetic rubber/elastomer golf ball core and cover

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Golf balls pose minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nike Golf Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Nike Golf

Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Rubber, synthetic polymer core; urethane/elastomer cover

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Golf balls present minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nike PD Soft

Nike Golf

Nike PD Soft

Surlyn ionomer cover, soft polymer core

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Golf ball with standard polymers, lower concern than coated apparel.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.