40/ 100
F
OverallF18/100
Nike 36-Count Mint Recycled Golf Ball

Nike Golf · Golf Balls & Equipment

Nike 36-Count Mint Recycled Golf Ball

F · High PFAS

Skip; golf ball coatings often use water-repellent coating treatments containing PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPFAS in coatings is the primary concern; other polymer hazards are low. Nike silent on source/treatment. Buy only if you accept PFAS risk or use minimally.

Golf balls typically receive water-resistant surface coatings to enhance performance. Nike does not disclose PFAS use or absence in this recycled ball product; coating chemistry remains undisclosed.

The safe swap

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Nike Golf

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Recycled rubber/synthetic polymer with coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This ball is composed of recycled rubber and synthetic polymer (likely polyurethane or similar elastomer) with a surface coating for durability and water repellency. The coating is the critical unknown: water-resistant finishes on golf balls are frequently formulated with PFAS-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) chemistry to maintain performance through repeated water exposure. Recycled content itself poses no inherent toxicity, but the coating formulation and any degradation products during use are the main safety variables.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has made public commitments to reduce PFAS in apparel and footwear but has not disclosed specific phase-out timelines or testing for golf equipment. Nike Golf's website and product documentation do not specify whether this ball uses PFAS-free water-repellent technology or traditional PFAS-based treatments. The silence on ball coating chemistry is typical across the golf industry, where water-repellent coating formulations are often proprietary and rarely disclosed to consumers.

How it compares in its category

Most recycled and conventional golf balls from major brands (Titleist, Callaway, Bridgestone, etc.) do not publicly disclose coating chemistry, making direct comparison difficult. Some specialty manufacturers (e.g., certain eco-focused brands) explicitly market PFAS-free balls, though these are less common and often more expensive. Nike's recycled ball sits in the mainstream tier where PFAS risk is neither confirmed nor ruled out, which is the norm rather than an exception in golf ball retail.

If you buy it

Store balls in a cool, dry place away from direct heat and UV, as polymer coating degradation accelerates in hot conditions and may increase shedding of coating particles. Do not boil or microwave balls for cleaning. Wash with cool water and mild soap only. Replace balls when the coating visibly cracks, peels, or becomes tacky, as degraded coating increases skin contact risk. If concerned about PFAS exposure, minimize contact with hands and rinse hands after handling.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

PFAS in water-repellent coating

Golf ball water-repellent surface treatments commonly use PFAS chemistry. Nike has not disclosed the specific water-repellent coating formulation for this model, so PFAS presence cannot be ruled out and is likely given industry norms.

Possible

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

As the ball's surface coating wears from play and weather exposure, small polymer fragments may shed. Recycled balls may have variable coating quality compared to virgin materials, increasing shedding risk over time.

None known

Heavy metals or residues from recycled rubber

Recycled rubber in golf balls is not typically linked to heavy metal contamination in published safety assessments. Nike does not disclose the source or purification process for recycled material, but no established recalls or warnings exist for this product line.

None known

Off-gassing from polymer or adhesives

Synthetic polymer golf balls do not have a history of significant VOC or formaldehyde off-gassing concerns when stored at normal temperatures. Risk increases only if balls are exposed to heat above 60°C.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Nike Golf

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Synthetic rubber/elastomer golf ball core and cover

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Golf balls pose minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nike Golf Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Nike Golf

Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Rubber, synthetic polymer core; urethane/elastomer cover

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Golf balls present minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nike PD Soft

Nike Golf

Nike PD Soft

Surlyn ionomer cover, soft polymer core

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Golf ball with standard polymers, lower concern than coated apparel.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.