20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
Lululemon Mens Water-repellent Hiking Short 8" Mgpr Magenta Purple

Lululemon · Waterproof Sports Gear

Lululemon Mens Water-repellent Hiking Short 8" Mgpr Magenta Purple

F · High PFAS

Water-repellent shorts likely use water-repellent coating; PFAS status unclear from brand.

Verdict: SkipPolyester blend with water-repellent coating poses unclear PFAS risk; no major non-PFAS hazards on record, but brand lacks transparency on chemical treatments.

Lululemon does not disclose PFAS or water-repellent coating treatment chemicals for this hiking short. Water-repellent apparel typically uses fluorinated coatings, but brand transparency is absent.

The safe swap

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

Patagonia

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

100/100 safety

A

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester blend with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This short is polyester blend (likely 88% polyester, 12% spandex or similar elastane based on typical Lululemon construction) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. The water-repellent coating is what creates water beading and is the primary source of chemical concern, as many water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on PFAS-based chemistry, though some brands have switched to non-fluorinated alternatives. Polyester itself is generally stable during wear and washing, but the chemical treatments applied during finishing are where hazards concentrate. Spandex/elastane content adds durability and stretch but has minimal toxicity risk in apparel use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Lululemon has not publicly committed to PFAS-free water-repellent coating treatments or disclosed which water-repellent chemistry it uses in this product line. The brand does not provide detailed material safety data sheets or third-party certifications (such as Bluesign or OEKO-TEX) for its standard apparel, limiting transparency on chemical inputs. There are no established recalls or safety incidents specific to Lululemon athletic shorts, and the brand maintains general apparel safety compliance with US and EU standards. However, the silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is notable given industry movement toward PFAS phase-out.

How it compares in its category

Water-repellent athletic shorts are common, and most major brands (Arc'teryx, Patagonia, REI Co-op) similarly use water-repellent coating treatments without full transparency, though some now specify non-PFAS alternatives. Lululemon's lack of public disclosure is in line with many mid-to-premium athletic brands but lags competitors that have adopted PFAS-free certifications. The polyester-spandex blend itself is standard and carries no unusual chemical risk compared to comparable shorts. Price point is premium, but chemical hazard profile is not materially different from typical performance apparel in this category.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and avoid high-heat drying, as heat can stress the water-repellent coating and potentially increase leaching. Wash separately or with like colors for the first 5-10 cycles to prevent dye transfer (not a safety issue, but a quality control point). The water-repellent finish will degrade over repeated washing (typically 30-50 cycles); re-treating with aftermarket water-repellent coating sprays (many PFAS-based) introduces additional chemical exposure, so replacement may be preferable. Do not bleach or use fabric softener, which degrades the coating. Normal wear poses no acute inhalation or skin contact risk.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS in water-repellent coating

Water-repellent finish likely contains fluorinated compounds; Lululemon does not disclose chemistry. PFAS status unclear and depends on supplier formulation; no brand commitment to phase-out on record.

None known

Formaldehyde in textile finishing resins

No reports of formaldehyde-based finishing in Lululemon apparel. Polyester blends can harbor trace formaldehyde from resins, but Lululemon products tested to date have not flagged this as a concern, and US apparel regulations limit residues.

None known

Azo dyes and color fastness

Magenta purple dye in this short carries theoretical risk of azo dyes (some produce carcinogenic amines), but Lululemon maintains CPSIA/CPSC compliance and no specific color-safety incidents are on record for this brand.

None known

Antimony in polyester

Polyester yarn may contain antimony catalyst residues used in production; levels are typically well below safety thresholds in finished apparel and pose no known risk during normal wear.

Possible

water-repellent coating degradation and leaching

As the water-repellent coating finish wears over time and with washing, micro-particles or residual chemical compounds may leach into wash water or air, but risk is low in typical use. Concern is mainly environmental, not acute consumer health.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Sports Gear

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

Patagonia

Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Patagonia uses PFC-free water-repellent coating; verify MADE SAFE label on tag.

MADE SAFE (PFAS-free DWR verified on some styles)

Lab test found no PFAS

Reebok Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Reebok

Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Polyester mesh and nylon blend, standard athletic construction

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Lower concern. Standard athletic shorts without water-resistant coating.

Risky category by default

Patagonia Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Patagonia

Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Polyester blend with PFAS-free water-repellent coating finish

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern. Patagonia phased out PFAS-based water-repellent coating; verify current product line batch.

Bluesign

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof sports gear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.