20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Quiksilver Men's Transit 19 Hybrid Shorts

Quiksilver · Waterproof Sports Gear

Quiksilver Men's Transit 19 Hybrid Shorts

F · High PFAS

Hybrid shorts likely use water-repellent coating; Quiksilver discloses nothing about PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPolyester blend with undisclosed water-repellent finish; PFAS likely but unconfirmed. No major hazards on record; manage care to limit treatment degradation.

Quiksilver's Transit shorts are a polyester-blend hybrid garment with unknown water-repellent finish. Brand makes no PFAS disclosure, raising typical concern for treated apparel.

The safe swap

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

Patagonia

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

100/100 safety

A

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester blend with water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These shorts are polyester blend fabric treated with a water-repellent (water-repellent coating) finish. Polyester itself is stable in normal wear, but the water-repellent coating is almost certainly fluorinated (PFAS-based) given industry standards for hybrid/water-resistant apparel. Quiksilver does not publicly specify the chemistry. The coating degrades with washing and wear, potentially releasing particles or altering over time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Quiksilver has published no public statement on PFAS use in apparel or phasing timelines, placing it in the silent majority of surf/action-sports brands. The company is not known for premium sustainability certifications like Bluesign or GOTS. Industry transparency on water-repellent chemistry is poor across this segment; Quiksilver follows no visible best-practice disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Hybrid shorts with water-repellent coating treatment are industry-standard for performance apparel. Most competitors (Rip Curl, O'Neill, Volcom) use similar undisclosed fluorinated finishes. A small number of brands (e.g., Patagonia for select lines) have committed to PFAS-free alternatives or phaseout timelines. Quiksilver's silence places it in the mainstream unaccountable tier.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air-dry to extend the water-repellent coating life; hot water and high heat break down treatment faster. Expect water repellency to fade after 10-20 washes. Do not machine-dry frequently. Polyester itself is durable and safe in normal use. Replace when the fit or color degrades, not due to chemical hazard risk.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Azo dyes

No specific azo dye ban or hazard reported in Quiksilver apparel. Polyester dyes are regulated in most manufacturing hubs, though Quiksilver does not certify dye compliance publicly.

None known

Formaldehyde resins

Polyester-blend shorts are unlikely to use formaldehyde-releasers for wrinkle resistance given the hybrid/athletic design. No recalls or disclosures suggest this risk.

Possible

Antimony in polyester

Polyester-blend fabrics may contain antimony oxide as a catalyst residue from fiber production. Levels in finished apparel are typically low and non-bioavailable, but Quiksilver does not disclose testing or limits.

Likely

water-repellent coating degradation and particle release

The water-repellent finish will degrade over the life of the shorts, especially with frequent washing. Small amounts of coating particles may shed into wash water or be inhaled as dust; long-term health impact is uncharacterized for end users.

None known

Heavy metals in dyes or pigments

No specific heavy-metal contamination reported in Quiksilver textiles. Industry regulation and supply-chain oversight in polyester dyeing are moderate in mainstream brands.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Sports Gear

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

Patagonia

Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Patagonia uses PFC-free water-repellent coating; verify MADE SAFE label on tag.

MADE SAFE (PFAS-free DWR verified on some styles)

Lab test found no PFAS

Reebok Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Reebok

Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Polyester mesh and nylon blend, standard athletic construction

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Lower concern. Standard athletic shorts without water-resistant coating.

Risky category by default

Patagonia Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Patagonia

Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Polyester blend with PFAS-free water-repellent coating finish

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern. Patagonia phased out PFAS-based water-repellent coating; verify current product line batch.

Bluesign

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof sports gear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.