Quiksilver · Waterproof Sports Gear
Quiksilver Men's Taxer Amphibian Hybrid Shorts
Hybrid shorts likely have water-repellent coating; Quiksilver does not disclose PFAS status.
Amphibian hybrid shorts use water-repellent treatment typical of board shorts, but Quiksilver provides no public PFAS disclosure or testing. Standard water-repellent coating finishes often contain PFAS; verification unavailable.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
polyester/nylon blend with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
These shorts combine polyester and nylon, both synthetic polymers chosen for durability and moisture-wicking in water sports. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish is the chemical concern: it typically relies on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) or, less commonly, wax-based alternatives to repel water. Quiksilver has not publicly disclosed which type they use in this model. Polyester and nylon themselves are stable under normal wear, but the finish degrades with washing and wear, potentially releasing particles and residual treatments.
The brand's record and disclosure
Quiksilver, owned by Boardriders Inc., has not published detailed chemical safety disclosures or PFAS phase-out commitments comparable to other major apparel brands. The company does not appear on public PFAS-elimination pledges or transparency reports. This silence is meaningful: brands leading on chemical safety typically market it prominently. Quiksilver's website and product labels do not specify water-repellent coating chemistry, which is standard practice but limits consumer choice.
How it compares in its category
Hybrid shorts with water-repellent coating are common in the water-sports category; most major competitors (Patagonia, The North Face, Rip Curl) face identical water-repellent coating questions, though some have committed to PFAS-free alternatives. Quiksilver's lack of public stance places it in the middle: neither a leader in safer chemistry nor a known violator. Price and performance are competitive; the chemical risk profile is not meaningfully different from peer brands without disclosure.
If you buy it
Wash in cold water and avoid fabric softeners, which can accelerate water-repellent coating breakdown and release residue. Limit dry-cleaning, as some solvents may interact with coating chemicals. Do not iron at high heat; the synthetic blend is stable under normal wear but prolonged high heat can degrade finishes. Replace after 2-3 years or when water no longer beads on the surface, as degraded water-repellent coating may leave behind chemical residue that washing alone won't fully remove. Consider contacting Quiksilver directly to request water-repellent coating type disclosure if that information matters to your decision.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Azo dyes in polyester
Polyester dyeing can use azo dyes, which are banned in the EU but still permitted in the US under some conditions. No specific recalls or reports tie Quiksilver products to restricted azo dyes, but standard industry testing is not publicly available for this model.
Antimony in polyester
Antimony is used as a catalyst in polyester production and can remain in trace amounts in finished fabric. Levels in apparel are typically low and unlikely to leach under normal wear, but no third-party testing of Quiksilver shorts for antimony content is publicly available.
water-repellent coating degradation and residue
The water-repellent coating finish will degrade with washing and UV exposure over time. If PFAS-based, degradation may release both particles and soluble compounds. Quiksilver does not disclose the chemical type, so users cannot assess whether residue poses a health concern post-wear.
Formaldehyde in resins
Formaldehyde resins are used in some polyester finishing processes (wrinkle resistance, color-fastness). This product is not marketed as wrinkle-resistant, and no recalls or reports link Quiksilver shorts to formaldehyde off-gassing.
Microplastics from shedding
Synthetic textiles shed microfibers during washing. Polyester and nylon hybrid shorts will contribute to this environmental and potential direct-exposure issue over their lifetime, but this is not specific to Quiksilver or avoidable within this category without choosing natural fibers.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Waterproof Sports Gear
Patagonia
Men's 10" Quandary Shorts
nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment
Lower concern. Patagonia uses PFC-free water-repellent coating; verify MADE SAFE label on tag.
✓Lab test found no PFAS
Reebok
Men's Athlete Speed Shorts
Polyester mesh and nylon blend, standard athletic construction
Lower concern. Standard athletic shorts without water-resistant coating.
⚠Risky category by default
Patagonia
Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts
Polyester blend with PFAS-free water-repellent coating finish
Lower concern. Patagonia phased out PFAS-based water-repellent coating; verify current product line batch.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
More waterproof sports gear grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.