20/ 100
F
OverallF8/100
Quiksilver Men's Union Heather Amphibian Hybrid Shorts

Quiksilver · Waterproof Sports Gear

Quiksilver Men's Union Heather Amphibian Hybrid Shorts

F · High PFAS

Hybrid shorts likely treated for water resistance; PFAS risk unconfirmed by brand.

Verdict: SkipWater-resistant polyester blend carries unconfirmed PFAS risk; no major brand safety record issues, but durability and care matter.

Quiksilver does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry for these hybrid shorts. Polyester blend with water treatment is typical for board shorts, often containing PFAS, but unverified here. Contact brand for specifics.

The safe swap

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

Patagonia

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

100/100 safety

A

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester blend with water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These shorts are a polyester blend (likely polyester-nylon or polyester-cotton mix) with a durable water-resistant (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric surface. The water-repellent coating is what makes the shorts repel water without soaking through, but historically many such coatings used PFAS chemicals (fluorocarbons) to achieve that effect. Modern water-repellent coating finishes can be PFAS-free, but Quiksilver has not disclosed which chemistry they use for this product. The polyester fiber itself is stable under normal wear; the variable hazard is entirely in the coating.

The brand's record and disclosure

Quiksilver (owned by Boardriders Inc.) has not made public commitments to PFAS-free water-repellent coating treatments across their apparel lines, and does not disclose coating chemistry on product labels or websites for most shorts. The brand has no major recalls or established safety controversies on record for this product category. However, their silence on water-repellency chemistry is notable in an industry where PFAS disclosure has become increasingly expected and some competitors have begun voluntary elimination or transparency efforts.

How it compares in its category

Water-resistant hybrid/athletic shorts are widespread, and nearly all major brands (Rip Curl, O'Neill, Patagonia, Arc'teryx) treat them similarly for water-repellent coating. Patagonia and some premium labels have begun switching to PFAS-free water-repellent coating or disclosing their use, making them slightly more transparent. Quiksilver's approach is middle-of-the-road: they apply functional water-repellent coating without public commitment to either PFAS-free chemistry or transparency. Most competitors in this price tier operate the same way.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cool water the first few times to minimize dye bleed or coating release. Machine wash is safe; chlorine bleach is not recommended (degrades water-resistant treatment). Avoid high heat dryers; air dry to preserve the water-repellent coating finish. The coating will degrade over 50-100 washes with normal care; when water no longer beads on the surface, the shorts have reached end-of-life for water resistance but remain wearable as regular shorts. Do not assume the water-repellent coating is 'refreshable' with consumer products unless explicitly labeled.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS in water-repellent coating (Fluorocarbons)

Water-resistant treatment on polyester blend shorts commonly uses PFAS-based fluorocarbon chemistry; Quiksilver has not disclosed or committed to PFAS-free alternatives for this product line. Risk is inhalation during manufacturing (primarily worker exposure) and potential leaching into skin/sweat under prolonged wet wear, though absorption through intact skin is low.

Possible

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Polyester blend textiles often use azo dyes for color fastness; some azo dyes can degrade into aromatic amines under sweat and UV exposure. Quiksilver does not specify dye chemistry for the 'Heather' colorway. Risk is low under normal wear but higher if shorts are worn wet in sun for extended periods.

None known

Antimony in polyester

Polyester resin can contain antimony as a catalyst; trace amounts may leach in contact with sweat or water. No recalls or test results on record for Quiksilver shorts. Modern polyester production increasingly avoids antimony, but disclosure is not standard.

None known

Formaldehyde in finishing resins

water-repellent coating and water-resistant finishes may contain formaldehyde-releasing compounds to improve durability. No established hazard reported for finished Quiksilver shorts; off-gassing is typically minimal after manufacturing and first wash.

Possible

Microfiber shedding from polyester blend

Polyester textiles shed microfibers during washing and wear, especially in blends with higher polyester content. Not a direct consumer health hazard but an environmental persistence concern. Quiksilver provides no microfiber reduction or evidence of special low-shed construction.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 62% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Sports Gear

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

Patagonia

Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Patagonia uses PFC-free water-repellent coating; verify MADE SAFE label on tag.

MADE SAFE (PFAS-free DWR verified on some styles)

Lab test found no PFAS

Reebok Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Reebok

Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Polyester mesh and nylon blend, standard athletic construction

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Lower concern. Standard athletic shorts without water-resistant coating.

Risky category by default

Patagonia Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Patagonia

Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Polyester blend with PFAS-free water-repellent coating finish

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern. Patagonia phased out PFAS-based water-repellent coating; verify current product line batch.

Bluesign

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof sports gear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.