20/ 100
F
OverallF6/100
Men's Champion Hybrid Water Resistant Shorts Size M

Champion · Waterproof Sports Gear

Men's Champion Hybrid Water Resistant Shorts Size M

F · High PFAS

Water-resistant shorts likely treated with water-repellent coating; Champion discloses nothing about PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPolyester/nylon blend with undisclosed water-resistant treatment poses PFAS uncertainty; standard textile hazards manageable with proper care.

Champion's hybrid shorts feature water-resistant treatment, common source of legacy PFAS in apparel. No public disclosure from brand regarding PFAS content or safer alternatives used.

The safe swap

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

Patagonia

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

100/100 safety

A

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester/nylon blend with water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Champion Hybrid shorts are a polyester/nylon blend, both synthetic polymers that are chemically stable in normal wear but may shed microfibers when abraded or washed. The water-resistant treatment applied to the fabric is the material concern: it almost certainly contains a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating, which historically relied on PFAS-based compounds like PFOA. The polyester itself contains antimony as a catalyst in its manufacturing; this residue typically remains bound in the polymer and poses minimal leaching risk during normal wear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Champion has not publicly disclosed specific PFAS restrictions, testing protocols, or water-repellent coating chemistry in consumer documentation available as of recent records. The brand has no widely documented commitments to PFAS-free water repellency or textile transparency comparable to outdoor brands (Arc'teryx, Patagonia) that market PFAS-free alternatives. Champion's parent company Hanesbrands has signed some apparel sustainability pledges but has not been noted for lead PFAS elimination in performance textiles. Absence of disclosure does not confirm PFAS use, but it reflects a gap in transparency typical of legacy athletic brands.

How it compares in its category

Water-resistant hybrid shorts are a commodity segment; most major brands (Nike, Adidas, Dick's house brands) use similar polyester blends with proprietary water-repellent coating treatments and rarely disclose PFAS status. Brands explicitly marketing PFAS-free water repellency (REI Co-op, some Outdoor Voices styles) typically charge a premium and are the exception. Champion's price point and lack of transparency place it in the mainstream middle: standard risk profile for the category, not elevated, but also not differentiated toward safety. For non-water-resistant alternatives in shorts, synthetic blends without water-repellent coating entirely eliminate this hazard class.

If you buy it

Wash in cold water with mild detergent; avoid fabric softeners and high heat (they can degrade the water-repellent coating). Wash inside-out to minimize external abrasion and microfiber shedding. Do not repeatedly dry-clean or expose to temperatures above 140°F, as heat can mobilize any surface treatments. Replace when seams fray, elastic fails, or water repellency visibly degrades (typically 1-2 years of regular use); worn-out shorts pose no acute hazard but offer no protective function.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Antimony residue in polyester

Antimony trioxide is used as a catalyst in polyester manufacturing and remains in the finished fiber at <0.5% by weight. Migration to skin during normal wear has not been documented as a concern in peer-reviewed literature; dermatolethal risk is not established for wearing antimony-catalyzed polyester.

Reported

Microfiber shedding during washing and wear

Polyester/nylon blends release microfibers into water and air with every wash and abrasion. These particles are not toxic per se, but they accumulate in aquatic ecosystems and wastewater; the concern is environmental rather than acute personal safety. Washing less frequently and using wash bags can reduce shedding by 30-40%.

Possible

water-repellent coating chemical composition (unspecified)

The water-resistant finish is treated with an unspecified water-repellent coating compound. Historically, these have been PFAS-based (covered separately); newer alternatives (silicone, wax, fluorine-free polymers) may be used but are not disclosed. Risk depends on which chemistry Champion selected; absence of information prevents grading above 'possible.'

None known

Formaldehyde resins in dyes or finishes

Modern polyester apparel rarely retains free formaldehyde if manufacturing standards are met; Champion's production facilities in Vietnam and Mexico are not known to have violations specific to formaldehyde. If a sensitivity exists, off-gassing would be minimal after the first wash.

None known

Azo dyes (colorant compounds)

No specific contamination or restricted azo dye use has been documented for Champion products. Polyester dyes are generally stable; however, in rare cases of poor dye fixation, sweating or friction could theoretically transfer color to skin, though this is not a typical hazard in quality athletic wear.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Sports Gear

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

Patagonia

Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Patagonia uses PFC-free water-repellent coating; verify MADE SAFE label on tag.

MADE SAFE (PFAS-free DWR verified on some styles)

Lab test found no PFAS

Reebok Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Reebok

Men's Athlete Speed Shorts

Polyester mesh and nylon blend, standard athletic construction

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Lower concern. Standard athletic shorts without water-resistant coating.

Risky category by default

Patagonia Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Patagonia

Men's Home Waters Hybrid Shorts

Polyester blend with PFAS-free water-repellent coating finish

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern. Patagonia phased out PFAS-based water-repellent coating; verify current product line batch.

Bluesign

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof sports gear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.