65/ 100
D
OverallF53/100
Wilton Silicone Baking Cups

Wilton · Silicone Baking Molds

Wilton Silicone Baking Cups

D · Elevated

Lower concern. Silicone cups unlikely to contain PFAS.

Verdict: SkipFood-grade silicone cups carry minimal documented hazard risks; no brand safety controversies on record; safe for typical baking use with proper care.

Wilton silicone baking cups are made from food-grade silicone, an inherently PFAS-free elastomer. Brand makes no PFAS claims but material type itself poses lower risk than nonstick coatings.

The safe swap

Mrs. Anderson Silicone Round Cake Pan

Mrs. Anderson's

Mrs. Anderson Silicone Round Cake Pan

80/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

food-grade silicone

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Wilton Silicone Baking Cups are made from food-grade silicone, a synthetic rubber polymer that does not contain the reactive chemical groups found in plastics like BPA or phthalates. Silicone has a high heat tolerance (typically safe to 450-500F) and is chemically inert at normal baking temperatures, meaning it does not leach or degrade readily. The material is non-porous and does not absorb oils or odors, reducing the risk of contamination accumulation over time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Wilton is a long-established US-based baking brand owned by Estes Lauder Companies. The company does not publish detailed chemical composition or third-party testing statements specific to these cups. No product recalls or safety warnings related to Wilton Silicone Baking Cups appear in public FDA or CPSC records. The brand markets these cups as food-grade but provides minimal transparency on manufacturing standards or testing protocols.

How it compares in its category

Silicone baking cups are safer than paper liners (no bleach or adhesive concerns) and more durable than single-use alternatives. They avoid the coating-degradation and metal-leaching risks of some non-stick ceramic or metal muffin tins. Compared to reusable silicone from boutique brands, Wilton offers similar material safety at a lower price point, though without the enhanced disclosure or certification some competitors provide.

If you buy it

Wilicone cups are dishwasher safe but hand washing extends lifespan. Do not exceed manufacturer heat guidelines (typically 450F); overheating silicone can cause material degradation and potential odor release. Store in a cool, dry place away from strong sunlight, as UV exposure degrades silicone over years. Replace cups if visible tears, discoloration, or persistent odor develop; these signal material breakdown.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Silicone leaching under extreme heat or degradation

While food-grade silicone is chemically stable at normal baking temperatures, sustained exposure above 500F or repeated thermal cycling can cause microscopic material degradation. No documented cases of harm from Wilton cups at intended temperatures, but risk exists if misused in ovens hotter than specified.

Possible

Odor absorption and off-gassing

Silicone can absorb strong food odors and volatile compounds from adjacent oven contents; some users report persistent smell after heating. This is cosmetic nuisance rather than safety risk but indicates material interaction with heated substances.

None known

Manufacturing impurities or unreacted monomers

Food-grade silicone certification suggests compliance with FDA standards for unreacted oligomers and heavy metals, but Wilton does not publish residual monomer testing. No recalls or complaints on record for this product.

Possible

Bacterial growth if not dried properly

Silicone's porosity is low, but crevices and seams can retain moisture. Improper drying between uses may foster mold or bacterial colonies; standard dishwasher or hand-washing with thorough drying prevents this.

None known

Lead or cadmium in pigments or fillers

No evidence of heavy metal contamination in Wilton silicone cups. Food-grade silicone certification implies testing for lead and cadmium, though Wilton does not disclose detailed analytical results.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Silicone Baking Molds

Mrs. Anderson Silicone Round Cake Pan

Mrs. Anderson's

Mrs. Anderson Silicone Round Cake Pan

Food-grade silicone

B
F
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Silicone cake pans present lower PFAS concern; no Teflon-family coating nonstick coatings used.

Risky category by default

Mrs. Anderson's Silicone Baking Mat

Mrs. Anderson's

Silicone Baking Mat

silicone baking mat

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; silicone mats do not typically contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

Mrs. Anderson's Full Size Silicone Baking Mat

Mrs. Anderson's

Full Size Silicone Baking Mat

100% silicone

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Silicone baking mat, lower PFAS concern.

Risky category by default

More silicone baking molds grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.