Titleist · Golf Balls & Golf Equipment
Miller Lite Titleist Golf Glove
Golf glove with water treatment; PFAS status unclear from brand.
Titleist golf gloves typically feature treated leather for water resistance, a common PFAS application. Titleist provides no public disclosure of PFAS-free status or water treatment chemistry.
The safe swap
Mizuno
Mizuno Comp Glove
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather with water-resistant treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This glove is constructed from leather with an applied water-resistant treatment. The treatment layer is the primary concern: water repellents on leather goods historically relied on PFAS compounds (perfluorochemicals), though modern formulations increasingly use non-fluorinated alternatives. Without Titleist's specific disclosure, you cannot confirm which chemistry is in this glove. Leather itself is generally stable, but the durability and safety of the water-resistant finish depend entirely on its composition and degradation over time.
The brand's record and disclosure
Titleist (Acushnet Holdings) has not published comprehensive chemical disclosure or PFAS commitments specific to golf gloves. The brand does not appear on major textile/apparel transparency indices (e.g., Textile Exchange, ZDHC Gateway) for this product line. No major recalls or safety incidents involving this specific glove model are on record. Without public certifications (Oeko-Tex, BLUESIGN, etc.), transparency around water-resistant treatment chemistry is absent.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves span a wide material range: synthetic microfiber, cabretta leather, and synthetic blends. Leather gloves treated for water resistance occupy a middle ground in terms of chemical exposure risk, as the finish is applied to a natural material rather than embedded in plastic. Premium brands increasingly seek non-PFAS water repellents, but commodity gloves (including many leather offerings) may still use legacy fluorinated chemistries. This product's exact positioning is unclear without brand transparency.
If you buy it
Store the glove in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or UV exposure to minimize coating degradation. Do not expose to high temperatures or solvents, which can break down water-resistant finishes and potentially release degradation byproducts. Wash by hand with mild soap and cool water only; machine washing risks coating damage. Replace the glove if the water repellent coating visibly degrades, peels, or becomes uneven, as this may indicate chemical instability.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Water-resistant treatment composition (fluorinated vs non-fluorinated)
Titleist has not disclosed whether this glove uses PFAS-based or alternative water repellents. Older formulations on leather athletic goods commonly relied on C6/C8 fluorochemicals; current industry practice is shifting away from these, but confirmation is absent.
Coating degradation and leachates
Water-resistant coatings on leather degrade with use and washing. As the finish breaks down, it may release microparticles or chemical residues; risk level depends on the specific treatment chemistry, which is undisclosed.
Leather tanning residues and heavy metals
Modern leather production uses regulated tanning methods in most markets. No specific incidents of heavy metal contamination in Titleist golf gloves have been reported, and leather gloves pose minimal skin absorption risk for heavy metals. Chromium VI (hexavalent) is a theoretical concern in tanning but is uncommon in premium leather goods.
Azo dyes in leather
Restricted azo dyes (banned under REACH and similar regulations) are unlikely in branded leather gloves sold in major markets, though Titleist does not explicitly certify avoidance. No recalls for dye-related harm in this product line are recorded.
Allergen sensitivity to leather or treatment additives
Some users report contact dermatitis or irritation from leather gloves, typically linked to tanning residues, dyes, or treatment chemicals. Titleist does not provide ingredient disclosure to assess individual allergen risk.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Equipment
Mizuno
Comp Glove
Leather/synthetic leather athletic glove
No known PFAS risk, but Mizuno discloses nothing about treatments.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Mizuno
Cabretta Leather Golf Glove
Cabretta leather, likely with standard leather tanning and finishing
Lower concern. Leather glove lacks water treatment trigger.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Callaway
Men's Chev Soft Golf Glove
leather and synthetic materials
Golf glove with lower PFAS concern; no known high-risk coatings.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More golf balls & golf equipment grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.