Shiseido · Moisturizer
Shiseido Bio-Performance Advanced Super Revitalizing Cream
Lower concern, cosmetic cream with no known PFAS triggers, but Shiseido has not disclosed PFAS policy.
Shiseido's Bio-Performance cream is a typical cosmetic emulsion without waterproofing, non-stick coatings, or textile treatments that commonly use PFAS. The brand does not publicly claim PFAS-free status or hold third-party verification.
Shop Shiseido on Amazon →Material
Water-based cosmetic emulsion (creams, oils, glycerin, extracts)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Bio-Performance Advanced Super Revitalizing Cream is a water-based emulsion combining glycerin, plant extracts, oils, and standard cosmetic humectants and emulsifiers. The formulation relies on chemical stabilizers and preservatives typical of premium skincare rather than novel or high-risk actives. Water-based creams have lower chemical volatility than oil-heavy products and do not undergo the heating processes that trigger concern in some product categories. No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, talc, or heavy-metal pigments are listed in available ingredient disclosures.
The brand's record and disclosure
Shiseido is a major Japanese cosmetics firm with ISO 22716 (Good Manufacturing Practice for Cosmetics) certification and established safety testing protocols. The brand has not published an explicit PFAS policy or ban statement, which is typical for cosmetic manufacturers relative to food-contact or outdoor brands. No significant safety recalls or regulatory actions specific to this product line are on public record. Ingredient transparency is standard but not exceptional; the brand discloses INCI lists but does not voluntarily test for emerging contaminants like PFAS or 1,4-dioxane.
How it compares in its category
Premium moisturizers in this price range (typically 60-80 USD) use similar water-glycerin-oil bases. Bio-Performance is positioned as a mid-to-high-end anti-aging cream and does not employ unusual actives or delivery systems that would elevate chemical risk relative to comparable products from Estee Lauder, Clinique, or Lancôme. The formulation avoids fragrance (parfum) in the primary formula, reducing allergen exposure compared to scented alternatives. Overall safety profile is consistent with mainstream prestige skincare.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve emulsion stability and prevent premature separationor rancidity of plant oils. Use a clean applicator or fingertip to avoid introducing bacteria, which can compromise a water-based cream's shelf life once opened. Replace every 12 months after opening; discard if you notice odor change, visible separation, or mold growth, as these indicate preservative failure. Discontinue use if you experience redness, itching, or sensitization; though rare with this formulation, individual sensitivities to glycerin or plant extracts vary.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Preservative allergens or contact sensitizers
Water-based creams require preservative systems; Shiseido formulations typically use phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone, or similar agents. Rates of contact dermatitis from these preservatives are low but reported, particularly in individuals with sensitive or compromised skin barrier.
1,4-dioxane (contaminant in surfactants or emulsifiers)
No published testing or recall data for this specific product. 1,4-dioxane can occur as a byproduct in ethoxylated ingredients common to cosmetic emulsions, but Shiseido does not disclose test results. Risk is theoretical without confirmation.
Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components
Bio-Performance Advanced formulations do not list parfum as a primary ingredient in most regional versions. Fragrance is not a documented concern for this product, though trade secret 'fragrance' components are not independently tested or disclosed.
Plant extract or botanical contaminants
The product contains proprietary plant extracts and fermented ingredients. No public testing for pesticide residues, microbial contamination, or heavy-metal bioaccumulation in botanical sources is disclosed; risk depends on supplier agricultural practices and sourcing, which are not transparent.
Emulsion degradation and microbial growth after opening
Water-based creams are prone to emulsion breakdown and microbial proliferation if contaminated or stored improperly. User reports of separation or odor after 6-12 months are common for premium creams without robust preservative clarity; replacement frequency is the primary mitigation.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Moisturizer
Tatcha
Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin
Water-based cosmetic creams and serums; glass/plastic packaging
Lower PFAS concern for a cosmetic moisturizer set, but Tatcha makes no public PFAS commitment.
⚠Risky category by default
Herbivore Botanicals
Orchid Facial Oil
plant oils, botanical extracts, glass bottle
Lower concern; facial oil with no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Herbivore Botanicals
Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil
plant oils, mineral pigments, glass bottle
Lower concern for PFAS; facial oil in glass, typical formulation poses minimal risk.
⚠Risky category by default
More moisturizer grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.