75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
CeraVe Moisturizing Cream

CeraVe · Moisturizer

CeraVe Moisturizing Cream

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern; conventional moisturizer without known water-repellent coating or grease-resistant additives.

Verdict: BuyWater-based emulsion with ceramides, no known hazardous additives or brand controversies; safe for typical skin use.

CeraVe Moisturizing Cream is a water-based emulsion with ceramides and humectants, materials not typically requiring PFAS treatment. The brand does not disclose PFAS practices, but the product category (unscented moisturizer) rarely incorporates intentional PFAS chemicals.

Shop CeraVe on Amazon →

Material

Water, glycerin, ceramides, humectants (cream emulsion)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

CeraVe Moisturizing Cream is an oil-in-water emulsion built on purified water, glycerin (a humectant), and three essential ceramides (1, 3, and 6-II) that mimic the skin barrier. The formula lacks occlusives like petrolatum or mineral oil in favor of lighter emollients and hyaluronic acid. These are well-established, cosmetic-grade ingredients with minimal inherent toxicity at typical use levels.

The brand's record and disclosure

CeraVe (owned by L'Oreal) has not faced major FDA actions or recalls tied to this moisturizer formulation. The brand does not publicly disclose full PFAS testing or commit to PFAS phase-out, but the product's water-based, simple composition makes intentional PFAS addition unlikely. Third-party testing by groups like Environmental Working Group has not flagged this specific product for heavy contamination concerns.

How it compares in its category

This cream occupies the mainstream dermatologist-recommended middle ground: more transparent ingredient listing than luxury brands, lower cost than clinical-grade options, and formulated to avoid common irritants like fragrance and dyes. Most competing ceramide moisturizers (Cetaphil, Eucerin, Vanicream) are chemically similar with comparable safety profiles; CeraVe's ceramic emphasis is marketing strength rather than a safety differentiator.

If you buy it

Apply to damp skin to maximize humectant benefit; store in a cool, dry place and cap tightly to prevent evaporation and microbial growth in the jar. Discard if you notice visible mold, separation, or off odors (typically 12-24 months of home use). Discontinue if irritation or allergic reaction develops; patch test on forearm first if you have very sensitive skin.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

1,4-dioxane (synthetic contaminant in emulsifiers)

Cosmetic emulsifiers like polysorbate 80 and cetyl alcohol may carry trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. No specific test results for this product are publicly available, but CeraVe's parent company (L'Oreal) does not systematically report 1,4-dioxane content; typical moisturizers contain levels well below EPA concern thresholds.

None known

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

CeraVe Moisturizing Cream is marketed as fragrance-free and unscented. The ingredient list does not include fragrance, essential oils, or flavor compounds, making allergic contact dermatitis from fragrance highly unlikely in this specific product.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments and colorants

This moisturizer contains no added dyes, colorants, or pigments; it appears white to off-white due to the emulsion structure alone. Heavy metal contamination in cosmetic pigments is not a known concern for uncolored formulations.

None known

Talc contamination

CeraVe Moisturizing Cream does not list talc or talc-derived absorbents in its ingredient deck. The product is marketed as talc-free by the brand and is not a powdered or aerosol formulation.

Possible

Preservative safety and formaldehyde releasers

The product contains phenoxyethanol and methylisothiazolinone (MIT), both approved preservatives in cosmetics at low levels. Formaldehyde release from MIT has been documented in some products under stress; CeraVe has not disclosed accelerated stability data, but preservative levels in this formula are within industry norms and regulatory limits.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Moisturizer

Tatcha Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin

Tatcha

Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin

Water-based cosmetic creams and serums; glass/plastic packaging

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern for a cosmetic moisturizer set, but Tatcha makes no public PFAS commitment.

Risky category by default

Herbivore Botanicals Orchid Facial Oil

Herbivore Botanicals

Orchid Facial Oil

plant oils, botanical extracts, glass bottle

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; facial oil with no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no transparency.

Risky category by default

Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil

Herbivore Botanicals

Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil

plant oils, mineral pigments, glass bottle

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower concern for PFAS; facial oil in glass, typical formulation poses minimal risk.

Risky category by default

More moisturizer grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.