Drunk Elephant · Moisturizer
Drunk Elephant B-Hydra Intensive Hydration Serum
Lower concern; no known PFAS vectors in aqueous cosmetic serum formulation.
Drunk Elephant's B-Hydra serum is a water-based hydrating product with no reported PFAS-typical ingredients like Teflon-family coating, water-repellent coatings, or nonstick treatments. The brand makes no PFAS claims, but the product category (liquid serum) and known ingredients present minimal risk for intentional PFAS use.
Shop Drunk Elephant on Amazon →Material
water-based serum (glycerin, hyaluronic acid, humectants)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
B-Hydra is a lightweight, water-based serum built around glycerin and hyaluronic acid, both common humectants that draw moisture into skin. The formulation contains no emulsifiers, silicones, or oils, which reduces the number of synthetic compounds that could pose stability or irritation risks. Water-based serums like this are inherently lower-risk than oil-based or cream-based products because they have fewer chemical preservative demands and no risk of oxidation-driven degradation common in lipid formulations.
The brand's record and disclosure
Drunk Elephant has built a public identity around 'clean beauty' and transparency, publishing ingredient lists without heavy obscuring. The brand does not actively claim third-party certification (organic, cruelty-free certs are absent from marketing) but has maintained a stance of avoiding commonly flagged ingredients like phthalates and parabens. No major product recalls or safety controversies specific to this line are on public record; the brand's silence on PFAS aligns with industry-wide inaction rather than indicating a hidden problem.
How it compares in its category
Water-based hydrating serums are among the lowest-risk cosmetic category because they lack complex emulsion chemistry and heavy preservative loads. B-Hydra is typical of premium hydration serums in structure but commands a higher price point ($68 USD) compared to drugstore alternatives (CeraVe, Neutrogena serums at $10-20), with no measurable safety advantage, only brand positioning. Functionally equivalent products use nearly identical humectant blends and pose similar negligible hazard profiles.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve the hyaluronic acid and glycerin activity; neither degrades with heat, but UV exposure can damage packaging. Use within 12 months of opening; water-based serums are vulnerable to bacterial colonization if contaminated with wet fingers or applicators, so avoid double-dipping. Discontinue use immediately if redness, burning, or itching develops; fragrance and botanical extracts in the formula can trigger sensitivity in reactive skin types, though this is a personal tolerance issue, not a product defect.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens / botanical sensitizers
The formula includes fragrance components and plant extracts (e.g., Watermelon Fruit Extract) that may trigger contact dermatitis or photosensitivity in susceptible individuals. No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives or 1,4-dioxane are documented in this product, so systemic fragrance hazard is limited to topical irritation.
Formaldehyde releasers / preservative toxins
Standard cosmetic preservative systems used in water-based serums (typically phenoxyethanol or plant-derived alternatives) do not release formaldehyde at approved concentrations. No evidence of formaldehyde donors in B-Hydra's published formula.
Heavy metals in pigments / colorants
This serum is colorless to pale yellow with no pigments or mineral additives; iron oxides, titanium dioxide, and other pigment-bound metals are absent. No hazard vector exists for metal accumulation.
Microplastics or synthetic polymer contamination
The formula is water and glycerin based with no silicone polymers, polyethylene beads, or microplastic fillers documented. Hyaluronic acid is a natural polymer not classified as microplastic.
Container leachables (packaging hazard)
B-Hydra is packaged in opaque plastic bottles; if the plastic is uncoated polycarbonate or low-quality polyethylene, minor BPA or phthalate leaching is theoretically possible over extended storage, though aqueous, low-pH environments minimize this risk compared to oil or alcohol-based products.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Moisturizer
Tatcha
Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin
Water-based cosmetic creams and serums; glass/plastic packaging
Lower PFAS concern for a cosmetic moisturizer set, but Tatcha makes no public PFAS commitment.
⚠Risky category by default
Herbivore Botanicals
Orchid Facial Oil
plant oils, botanical extracts, glass bottle
Lower concern; facial oil with no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Herbivore Botanicals
Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil
plant oils, mineral pigments, glass bottle
Lower concern for PFAS; facial oil in glass, typical formulation poses minimal risk.
⚠Risky category by default
More moisturizer grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.