40/ 100
F
OverallF22/100
Men's Harbor Glove - Harbor / Wear on my left-hand / L

Odyssey · Golf Balls & Golf Equipment

Men's Harbor Glove - Harbor / Wear on my left-hand / L

F · High PFAS

Golf gloves often use water-repellent coating treatments; Odyssey has not disclosed PFAS status.

Verdict: SkipGolf glove with unconfirmed water-repellent chemistry and silent brand stance on PFAS; acceptable with informed purchase and regular inspection.

Odyssey Harbor Gloves likely have water-resistant finish typical of golf gloves, which may contain PFAS. Brand provides no public PFAS disclosure or testing data.

The safe swap

Mizuno Comp Glove

Mizuno

Mizuno Comp Glove

85/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather or synthetic leather glove with waterproof treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Men's Harbor Glove is a leather or synthetic leather glove treated with a waterproof/water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. Golf gloves in this category typically use either polyurethane-based synthetic leather or genuine leather with fluorochemical or wax-based water treatments. The water-repellent coating treatment is the primary chemical concern; synthetic leather itself (polyurethane or PVC) has low acute hazard but degrades over time with hand moisture and friction, potentially releasing breakdown particles.

The brand's record and disclosure

Odyssey (a Callaway Golf brand) does not publicly disclose PFAS content or commitment to PFAS-free water repellency in their glove lines. The company has not published transparency reports on chemical restrictions or third-party certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or Bluesign) for apparel. No major safety recalls or chemical contamination incidents are on record for Odyssey gloves, but the silent stance on water-repellent coating chemistry leaves purchaser uncertainty about fluorochemical use.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves are a minor-use apparel item (worn 2-4 hours per use) with brief skin contact. Compared to everyday clothing or footwear, exposure duration and surface area are low. Most golf gloves (including competitors like Titleist, FootJoy) also use water-repellent coating treatments and do not disclose PFAS status, making Odyssey typical rather than distinctive. A few brands (e.g., some organic/sustainable lines) offer wax-based water-repellent coating alternatives, but these are less common and typically cost more.

If you buy it

Inspect the glove weekly for coating damage, peeling, or delamination on the palm and fingers; replace immediately if the waterproof layer separates, as this can trap moisture against skin and degrade the material faster. Wash by hand in cool water with mild soap; do not machine wash or dry-clean, as heat and solvents accelerate synthetic leather breakdown. Allow air-drying away from direct heat or sunlight. Replace every 12-18 months of regular use or sooner if the grip or water repellency noticeably decreases.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment chemistry (likely PFAS)

Odyssey does not disclose whether water repellency uses fluorochemical (PFAS) or fluorine-free methods. Industry standard for golf gloves is fluorochemical water-repellent coating; PFAS-free alternatives are rare in this category. Skin contact is intermittent and brief (during play), limiting direct absorption risk, but PFAS can accumulate in sweat/moisture near treated surface.

Reported

Synthetic leather or polyurethane coating degradation

Synthetic leather gloves commonly show peeling, cracking, or particulate shedding after 12-24 months of moisture exposure and friction. Degradation products (microparticulates of polyurethane or PVC) are not formally regulated but may be inhaled or ingested in trace amounts; no acute toxicity is documented for occasional exposure from a single glove.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in leather tanning or bonding

If genuine leather is used, tanning processes may include formaldehyde-based fixatives. Odyssey has not disclosed leather sourcing or tanning method. Finished leather gloves typically off-gas formaldehyde at very low levels after curing; direct skin contact during use presents minimal inhalation or dermal absorption risk for a single glove worn briefly.

None known

Azo dyes in leather or synthetic coloring

Leather and synthetic leather are often dyed with azo colorants, some of which can cleave to release carcinogenic amines under heavy sweating or friction. No specific incidents or testing results are public for Odyssey gloves; risk is theoretical and very low given intermittent, brief wear on a single small item.

Possible

Contact dermatitis or sensitization from treated surface

Residual chemicals from water-repellent coating treatment, dyes, or leather finish can cause irritation or allergic contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. This is a known but uncommon issue with golf gloves; Odyssey does not list hypoallergenic or allergen-tested variants. Discontinue use immediately if rash, redness, or itching develops.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Equipment

Mizuno Comp Glove

Mizuno

Comp Glove

Leather/synthetic leather athletic glove

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

No known PFAS risk, but Mizuno discloses nothing about treatments.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Mizuno Cabretta Leather Golf Glove

Mizuno

Cabretta Leather Golf Glove

Cabretta leather, likely with standard leather tanning and finishing

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. Leather glove lacks water treatment trigger.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Callaway Men's Chev Soft Golf Glove

Callaway

Men's Chev Soft Golf Glove

leather and synthetic materials

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Golf glove with lower PFAS concern; no known high-risk coatings.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & golf equipment grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.