Landscape Supply · Artificial Turf
LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length
Skip until brand clarifies fabric composition and PFAS status.
LITA ECO Ultra Thick appears to be a landscape/garden fabric product, but public information on its exact material composition and any water-resistant treatments is unavailable. Without disclosure of whether water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings are applied, PFAS risk cannot be reliably assessed.
Shop Landscape Supply on Amazon →Material
Landscape fabric/geotextile (presumed polypropylene or polyester base)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
LITA ECO Ultra Thick is a geotextile landscape fabric, most likely polypropylene (PP) or polyester, used as a weed barrier under artificial turf or mulch. The 'ultra thick' designation suggests higher grammage (weight per square meter), which improves durability and UV stability. The manufacturer does not publicly specify the base fiber or whether the water-resistance is achieved through Teflon-type coating, silicone, or other water-repellent treatment, which is a critical gap for safety assessment. Cut-to-length products rely on the underlying fabric's chemical stability; degradation risk depends entirely on material composition and treatment chemistry.
The brand's record and disclosure
Landscape Supply, the vendor, maintains no publicly available certification (GreenGuard, Cradle-to-Cradle, or similar) and does not disclose product composition, manufacturing location, or PFAS status on product pages or safety documentation. This silence is significant: landscape fabrics marketed as 'eco' are expected to clarify whether water-resistance uses PFAS-based chemistry (common in older geotextiles) or PFAS-free alternatives. No known recalls or documented contamination issues are on record for this specific SKU, but absence of transparency limits confidence.
How it compares in its category
Landscape fabrics range from untreated polypropylene (no chemical treatment, biodegrades faster) to heavily treated polyester with fluorocarbon or silicone coatings (longer lifespan, chemical burden unclear). LITA ECO's positioning as 'ultra thick' and 'eco' suggests a mid-tier product, but the lack of third-party grading or fiber certification makes it harder to compare durability and chemical risk to competitors like Agfabric or DeWitt, which provide more material transparency. Cut-to-length availability is standard and not a hazard differentiator.
If you buy it
Request written confirmation from Landscape Supply of the base fiber (polypropylene vs. polyester), the water-resistance treatment (PFAS-free status required), and UV additive type before ordering. Install only under outdoor ground contact; do not use in food gardens, children's play zones, or areas with direct skin contact. Inspect every 2-3 years for UV degradation (brittleness, discoloration) and replace if tears allow soil migration. Do not burn off-cuts; dispose as inert waste or request take-back.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Unknown water-resistance chemistry (possible PFAS or fluorocarbon treatment)
Geotextiles labeled as water-resistant often use Teflon-type coating or PFAS-based coatings; LITA ECO does not disclose treatment type, creating uncertainty about leaching risk to soil and groundwater over time.
UV-additive and pigment composition undisclosed
Landscape fabrics contain UV absorbers and sometimes carbon black or iron oxide pigments to extend outdoor life; heavy metals (e.g., cadmium, lead) in pigments are possible but unconfirmed without spectroscopy or material safety data.
Microplastic fiber shedding from degradation
All polypropylene and polyester geotextiles eventually fragment under UV and mechanical stress; cut-to-length products with exposed edges may shed microfibers into soil more readily than sewn or sealed products.
Flame retardant additives (if polyester-based)
Some polyester geotextiles contain brominated or phosphate flame retardants to meet fire codes; LITA ECO does not disclose flame-retardant use, and such additives can leach if the fabric contacts water or acidic soil.
Degradation pathway and disposal ambiguity
Landscape fabrics do not biodegrade significantly in typical soil conditions and remain as persistent plastic waste; manufacturer provides no end-of-life guidance, leaving disposal burden and environmental persistence unclear.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More artificial turf grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.