AstroTurf · Artificial Turf
LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length
Skip until AstroTurf discloses turf composition; synthetic turf historically may use PFAS in backing or infill.
LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length is a synthetic turf product; AstroTurf makes no public PFAS claims. Synthetic turf backings and infills have historically contained PFAS in some formulations. Without third-party testing or a brand disclosure statement, PFAS risk cannot be ruled out.
Shop AstroTurf on Amazon →Material
Synthetic turf fibers (polyethylene/polypropylene backing)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
LITA ECO Ultra Thick uses polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) fibers on a synthetic backing, typical of modern artificial turf. The backing layer is the primary concern: synthetic turf backings historically have used PFAS compounds in coatings or adhesives to improve water resistance and durability, though AstroTurf has not publicly disclosed whether this product contains PFAS. The thick construction suggests increased material volume, which could amplify leaching risks if hazardous compounds are present in backing or infill systems.
The brand's record and disclosure
AstroTurf has not published a public materials declaration, PFAS statement, or third-party certifications (such as GreenGuard or similar) for this product line, making it impossible to verify absence of PFAS or other regulated substances. The company's silence on turf composition is notable because major synthetic turf manufacturers have begun disclosing PFAS content due to regulatory and liability pressure in states like California and Colorado. Without documentation, the product cannot be evaluated as a lower-risk option relative to competitors who provide transparency.
How it compares in its category
Artificial turf products vary widely in backing chemistry and infill materials (sand, rubber crumb, or organics). Some competitors (e.g., certain FieldTurf products) have moved toward PFAS-free formulations and published composition summaries; others remain undisclosed. The 'Eco' branding on this LITA line suggests some environmental positioning, but without third-party verification or disclosure, it is unclear whether this reflects genuine material selection or marketing framing. Natural grass remains the lowest-chemical baseline if PFAS exposure is a primary concern.
If you buy it
Limit direct skin contact, especially for young children and pregnant individuals, until AstroTurf clarifies composition. Ensure proper drainage and avoid pooling water, which can concentrate leachables if present. Inspect backing and seams annually for degradation; replace if visible cracks or separations occur, as damaged backing increases leaching surface area. If infill (sand or crumb) is used, source it from suppliers with PFAS testing documentation and replace periodically per manufacturer guidance.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
PFAS in backing or adhesives
Synthetic turf backings have historically contained PFAS to enhance water resistance; AstroTurf has provided no public disclosure of PFAS status for this product, leaving risk unquantified.
Microplastic shedding from fibers
Polyethylene and polypropylene turf fibers degrade over time and under UV/mechanical wear, releasing microplastics into soil and waterways; no product-specific testing published for LITA ECO.
Leaching from backing polymers or adhesives
Synthetic backings and joining adhesives may leach unreacted monomers or plasticizers when wet or heated; risk depends on backing chemistry not disclosed here.
Antimony in polyester components
LITA ECO uses polyethylene/polypropylene fibers, not polyester, so antimony as a catalyst is unlikely; however, backing composition is undisclosed.
Infill contamination (if sand or crumb used)
If product installation uses recycled rubber crumb or untested sand, infill may contain heavy metals or PFAS independent of the turf itself; buyer responsibility to source verified infill.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More artificial turf grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.