75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Herbivore TREMELLA Silky Hydration Gel Cream

Herbivore Botanicals · Moisturizer

Herbivore TREMELLA Silky Hydration Gel Cream

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern for a water-based moisturizer, but brand transparency is absent.

Verdict: BuyWater-based gel cream with established safe ingredients and no documented hazards; low PFAS risk typical of category, though brand transparency on chemicals is minimal.

This tremella hydration gel cream is a water-based cosmetic with no known Teflon-family coating coatings or water-/stain-resistant treatments that typically trigger PFAS use. Herbivore Botanicals makes no public PFAS claims.

Shop Herbivore Botanicals on Amazon →

Material

Water-based gel cream with tremella, glycerin, botanicals

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Tremella Silky Hydration Gel Cream is a water-based emulsion centered on tremella mesenterica extract, glycerin, and botanical extracts. Water-based formulations carry inherently lower risk of problematic synthetic additives compared to oil or silicone platforms. The gel-cream texture relies on thickeners and humectants rather than occlusive polymers, reducing concerns about microplastic shedding or long-chain synthetic residues on skin.

The brand's record and disclosure

Herbivore Botanicals markets itself as a clean, botanical-focused brand but does not publicly disclose full ingredient safety testing, supplier audits, or third-party certifications (e.g., no EWG Verified, no ISO 16128 compliance statements). The brand has not issued formal statements addressing PFAS avoidance or microplastic-free commitments, despite marketing premium positioning. No recalls or substantiated safety incidents are on record for this product line.

How it compares in its category

Water-based gel creams are among the lowest-risk moisturizer formats; this product sits in the mid-to-premium segment where botanical claims dominate but chemical transparency lags behind clinical brands. Compared to occlusive creams or serums with silicones, tremella formulas pose less microplastic or bioaccumulation risk. Price point and ingredient list are competitive, though disclosure rigor is below best-in-class brands like Vanicream or CeraVe.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, damp skin to maximize hydration retention from glycerin and tremella. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to preserve botanical actives. A tube lasts 4-6 weeks with typical facial application; discontinue if irritation develops and patch-test on inner arm first if you have sensitive skin or fragrance sensitivities. Do not apply around eyes unless labeled for that use.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Product formulation is not publicly detailed enough to confirm fragrance source or whether it includes common sensitizers like linalool or limonene. Herbivore does not provide full fragrance ingredient breakdown, which is standard in premium skincare.

None known

Formaldehyde releasers in preservative systems

No evidence of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea) in published ingredient lists for this product line. Water-based gels typically use safer preservative classes like phenoxyethanol or sodium benzoate.

Possible

Heavy metals in botanical extracts and pigments

Tremella and other plant-derived ingredients can accumulate cadmium or lead depending on growing region and supplier practices. Herbivore does not publish heavy metal testing data or supplier audit results for raw materials.

Possible

1,4-dioxane as manufacturing contaminant

Water-based emulsions may contain trace 1,4-dioxane if ethoxylated emulsifiers are used without vacuum stripping. Herbivore does not disclose testing for this contaminant, though risk is lower in gel formulas than in creamy lotions.

None known

Microplastics from synthetic polymers

Gel-cream format and botanical positioning suggest minimal synthetic polymer use. No microbeads or exfoliating particles are evident in product description, reducing shedding risk.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Moisturizer

Tatcha Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin

Tatcha

Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin

Water-based cosmetic creams and serums; glass/plastic packaging

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern for a cosmetic moisturizer set, but Tatcha makes no public PFAS commitment.

Risky category by default

Herbivore Botanicals Orchid Facial Oil

Herbivore Botanicals

Orchid Facial Oil

plant oils, botanical extracts, glass bottle

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; facial oil with no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no transparency.

Risky category by default

Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil

Herbivore Botanicals

Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil

plant oils, mineral pigments, glass bottle

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower concern for PFAS; facial oil in glass, typical formulation poses minimal risk.

Risky category by default

More moisturizer grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.