75/ 100
C
OverallC71/100
Herbivore Botanicals Pink Cloud Rosewater Moisture Creme

Herbivore Botanicals · Moisturizer

Herbivore Botanicals Pink Cloud Rosewater Moisture Creme

C · Moderate

Lower concern. Moisturizing cream with no inherent PFAS application; no waterproofing or nonstick claims.

Verdict: BuyWater-based moisturizer with standard cosmetic ingredients; no established safety red flags or brand controversies on record.

Herbivore Botanicals Pink Cloud is a water-and-glycerin-based facial moisturizer with rosewater and botanical ingredients. No waterproof, stain-resistant, or nonstick coatings are claimed or typical for this product category.

Shop Herbivore Botanicals on Amazon →

Material

water, glycerin, botanical extracts, humectants

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Pink Cloud is a water-glycerin emulsion with botanical extracts (rose, hyaluronic acid) and standard cosmetic humectants and emulsifiers. Glycerin and water are inert hydrating agents with no known toxicity at cosmetic concentrations. The formula lacks occlusive silicones or mineral oil, relying instead on lightweight botanical actives, which reduces risk of pore-clogging or barrier disruption in sensitive skin.

The brand's record and disclosure

Herbivore Botanicals markets itself as clean beauty and does not claim third-party certification (no EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny, or similar). The brand does not publicly disclose supply-chain testing, heavy metal screening, or formaldehyde-releaser avoidance in marketing materials. No major recalls or regulatory actions are on public record for this product line.

How it compares in its category

This moisturizer sits in the mid-tier clean beauty segment. It avoids synthetic fragrance (uses botanical rose) and common irritants like dimethicone, placing it lower-risk than conventional drugstore creams. However, it lacks third-party certification and transparent testing claims that competitors like Vanicream or CeraVe (with published stability and contamination data) provide.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve botanical actives and prevent microbial growth in the water phase. Use within 12 months of opening; water-based formulas without strong preservatives can degrade. Patch test on inner arm first if you have sensitive skin or fragrance sensitivity, as botanical rose extract can trigger contact dermatitis in a small percentage of users.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens (botanical rose extract)

Herbivore uses rose water and rose extract rather than synthetic fragrance, but botanical rose still contains geraniol and other natural sensitizers that can provoke allergic contact dermatitis or eczema flare in sensitive individuals. No published allergy prevalence data for this specific formulation.

None known

Preservative system adequacy

The product does not publicly disclose its preservative package. Water-based creams require effective preservatives to prevent bacterial and mold growth; underdosing can lead to microbial contamination over the product lifetime. No recalls or contamination reports are on record.

None known

Heavy metals in botanical extracts

Botanical extracts can accumulate heavy metals (lead, cadmium) from soil, especially if sourcing is unregulated. Herbivore does not publish third-party heavy metal testing results. Industry testing is not mandatory for botanical moisturizers unless a brand chooses transparency.

None known

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

The product label and marketing do not indicate the use of known formaldehyde donors like DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea. No public disclosure or recall history suggests their presence, but full ingredient transparency is not confirmed.

None known

Hyaluronic acid purity and molecular weight

Hyaluronic acid itself is inert, but low-cost sourcing can introduce bacterial endotoxins or inconsistent molecular weight affecting hydration. Herbivore does not disclose source or purity testing. This is a quality-consistency issue rather than acute toxicity risk.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 82% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Moisturizer

Tatcha Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin

Tatcha

Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin

Water-based cosmetic creams and serums; glass/plastic packaging

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern for a cosmetic moisturizer set, but Tatcha makes no public PFAS commitment.

Risky category by default

Herbivore Botanicals Orchid Facial Oil

Herbivore Botanicals

Orchid Facial Oil

plant oils, botanical extracts, glass bottle

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; facial oil with no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no transparency.

Risky category by default

Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil

Herbivore Botanicals

Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil

plant oils, mineral pigments, glass bottle

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower concern for PFAS; facial oil in glass, typical formulation poses minimal risk.

Risky category by default

More moisturizer grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.