20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
Evenflo Shyft DualRide Padded Travel Bag

Evenflo · Sports Equipment Padding

Evenflo Shyft DualRide Padded Travel Bag

F · High PFAS

Skip until Evenflo discloses water-resistant coating chemistry.

Verdict: SkipTravel bag with undisclosed water-resistant coating (likely PFAS); no formaldehyde or dye hazards on record, but coating chemistry unknown pending brand transparency.

Travel bag fabric features water-resistant treatment, typical for padded carriers. Evenflo provides no public disclosure of coating composition or PFAS status, limiting transparency.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

padded fabric with water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Evenflo Shyft DualRide uses padded polyester or nylon fabric with a water-resistant coating applied to the outer surface. The coating composition is not publicly specified by Evenflo, which is the core concern: water-repellent treatments on textiles historically rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) or, less commonly, silicone-based alternatives. The padding is likely polyester or polyurethane foam, and the metal or plastic hardware (zippers, clasps) may contain trace metals depending on supplier.

The brand's record and disclosure

Evenflo does not publicly disclose the chemical composition of water-resistant coatings on its gear or declare PFAS-free status. The brand has not signed transparency pledges (such as ZDHC Gateway or bluesign) specific to textile chemistry. No environmental health certifications (Oeko-Tex, GOTS) are listed for this product line. This silence on coating chemistry is the defining gap; competitors like Graco and other carriers increasingly specify coating materials or certify against PFAS.

How it compares in its category

Travel bags and padded carriers in this segment typically use polyester with water-resistant coatings; most brands do not disclose coating type, putting Evenflo in the industry norm rather than a standout. Some premium brands (e.g., Clek, GB, Nuna) have begun phasing PFAS or certifying coatings; budget and mid-tier brands like Evenflo remain opaque. The lack of transparency is a relative weakness, not a unique failure.

If you buy it

Store the bag in a well-ventilated space for the first few days to allow any coating off-gassing to diminish. Wipe the exterior with a damp cloth rather than machine-washing if possible; avoid heat that could mobilize coating compounds. Inspect seams and zippers annually for wear; replacement of a damaged bag is preferable to prolonged exposure to degrading coating material. Do not use for food storage or near infant feeding areas as a precaution given the unknown coating.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Water-resistant coating (undisclosed chemistry)

The product uses an unspecified water-resistant treatment; while it may be silicone-based or other non-PFAS alternatives, Evenflo's silence means PFAS presence cannot be ruled out. Potential off-gassing during use and degradation over time if PFAS-based.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in textile finishing

No public record of formaldehyde-based wrinkle resist or dye-fixing treatments on Evenflo carrier bags. Polyester/nylon base materials do not require formaldehyde unless additional finishing is applied; not flagged in available product information.

None known

Azo dyes or restricted colorants

No recalls or safety alerts related to dyes or heavy-metal pigments in Evenflo padded bags. The brand does not advertise restricted-substance testing, but this hazard class is not established as a concern for this product line.

Possible

Polyurethane foam degradation and off-gassing

If padding contains polyurethane foam, off-gassing of volatile compounds (aldehydes, amines) may occur, especially in warm or enclosed spaces. Polyester padding carries lower risk; Evenflo does not specify foam type. Off-gassing typically diminishes after initial weeks but is more pronounced in infants' proximity.

None known

Metal hardware (zippers, clasps) trace contaminants

Standard zippers and plastic hardware on soft goods carry low risk of lead or cadmium leaching unless direct contact with skin or food occurs. No product-specific safety data; not a typical concern for travel bag hardware.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Sports Equipment Padding

Easton Universal Padding Fit Kit

Easton

Universal Padding Fit Kit

foam padding, elastic straps

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated4 flags

Low risk product, but brand discloses nothing on PFAS.

Risky category by default

Easton Pro Style Shock Absorbing Pad

Easton

Pro Style Shock Absorbing Pad

Foam padding, likely EVA or polyurethane

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated4 flags

Lower concern; foam padding unlikely PFAS source, but no disclosure confirmed.

Risky category by default

Macgregor Shock Absorbing Base

MacGregor

Shock Absorbing Base

foam or elastomer cushioning in shoe base

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Unknown material composition.

Risky category by default

More sports equipment padding grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.