Easton · Sports Equipment Padding
Easton Power Pad
Unknown waterproofing treatment; brand silent on PFAS details.
Easton Power Pad is a moisture-wicking athletic garment likely treated with water-repellent coating finish. Brand discloses no PFAS information; treatment chemistry unclear from public sources.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
nylon/polyester blend with moisture-wicking treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The Easton Power Pad is a nylon and polyester blend engineered for moisture-wicking in athletic wear. The synthetic fibers themselves are stable polymers with low leaching risk under normal wear. However, the moisture-wicking treatment applied to the fabric is not detailed by Easton, which is the core concern: water-repellent finishes on athletic textiles commonly use fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to function, though alternative non-fluorinated hydrophobic treatments exist.
The brand's record and disclosure
Easton is a major sporting goods manufacturer with no public PFAS disclosure policy or commitment to phasing out fluorinated finishes in their apparel. The company has not published transparency reports on chemical use in textiles. This silence is notable because competitors in the athletic wear space have begun disclosing or eliminating PFAS; Easton's lack of engagement suggests either unaddressed use or intentional non-disclosure.
How it compares in its category
Athletic moisture-wicking pads occupy a middle tier of chemical risk. Higher-end brands (Patagonia, Arc'teryx) explicitly state PFAS-free durable water repellency or use alternatives. Mass-market athletic brands often remain silent on treatment chemistry, making Easton typical rather than exceptional. The nylon-polyester blend itself is standard; the unknown finish is the differentiator.
If you buy it
Wash separately in cold water before first wear to remove any residual coating or treatment chemicals. Avoid dry-cleaning, which may mobilize or concentrate any PFAS present. Standard machine wash on gentle cycle is appropriate. Replace when elastic or seams degrade (typically 50-100 wears for athletic pads). If the product carries no PFAS-free label after purchase, request product specification sheets from the retailer to clarify the finish chemistry.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fluorinated water-repellent finish (PFAS class)
Moisture-wicking treatments on athletic textiles frequently employ PFAS compounds; Easton's non-disclosure makes presence impossible to rule out. Contact with skin during prolonged wear could enable dermal absorption.
Azo dyes (color fastness hazard)
No recalls or testing reports indicate azo dyes in Easton apparel. Standard nylon-polyester blends and major manufacturers typically screen for banned azo compounds, though independent verification is absent.
Formaldehyde resin finishes
Formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resist or shape-memory treatments are uncommon in modern athletic moisture-wicking pads; Easton does not market this product with such claims, so risk is low.
Antimony in polyester
Polyester component may contain antimony trioxide as a polymerization catalyst. Modern polyester typically has minimal residual antimony, but non-migration testing data for this specific product is not publicly available.
Microfiber shedding during washing
Nylon-polyester blends shed microfibers during machine washing. While the hazard is environmental and not direct-exposure toxicity, repeated laundering will release synthetic particles; cold water and gentle cycles reduce shedding.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Sports Equipment Padding
Easton
Universal Padding Fit Kit
foam padding, elastic straps
Low risk product, but brand discloses nothing on PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
Easton
Pro Style Shock Absorbing Pad
Foam padding, likely EVA or polyurethane
Lower concern; foam padding unlikely PFAS source, but no disclosure confirmed.
⚠Risky category by default
MacGregor
Shock Absorbing Base
foam or elastomer cushioning in shoe base
Unknown material composition.
⚠Risky category by default
More sports equipment padding grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.