65/ 100
D
OverallF39/100
MacGregor Umpire's Inside Chest Protector

MacGregor · Sports Equipment Padding

MacGregor Umpire's Inside Chest Protector

D · Elevated

Lower PFAS concern. Sports equipment padding typically PFAS-free.

Verdict: SkipFoam chest protector with no established safety recalls; standard sports gear construction poses minimal hazard if maintained and replaced when degraded.

Umpire chest protectors use basic foam padding and fabric without typical water-repellent coating or stain-resistant treatments that require PFAS. Brand makes no PFAS claims, but material composition suggests lower risk.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

foam padding, cotton/poly blend outer shell

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

MacGregor's umpire chest protector uses foam padding (likely polyethylene or EVA foam) bonded to a cotton-polyester blend outer shell. Foam padding in sports protective gear is chosen for impact absorption and breathability; the cotton-poly blend provides durability and washability. Unlike rigid plastics or coated fabrics, this material combination avoids common leaching risks but can degrade mechanically over time with impact stress and repeated laundering.

The brand's record and disclosure

MacGregor does not publicly disclose material certifications or chemical testing for this product line. No recalls or safety violations specific to this chest protector are on record. The brand manufactures sports equipment broadly but does not maintain a visible sustainability or chemical disclosure standard comparable to major athletic brands, making independent verification of hazard mitigation difficult.

How it compares in its category

This product is typical for baseball umpire gear: foam-based protection is standard and less concerning than rigid plastic or metal-reinforced designs that may contain antimony or decorative coatings. Compared to high-performance athletic wear with antimicrobial finishes or flame-retardant treatments, a basic foam protector avoids those chemical layers. Price and availability reflect commodity-level production, which often correlates with fewer specialty chemical treatments but also less rigorous batch testing.

If you buy it

Inspect the seams and foam regularly for separation or compression loss, which signals impact degradation and reduced protection. Wash in cool water with standard detergent; avoid bleach and high heat (dryer) as these degrade foam and adhesive bonds. Replace after 3-5 seasons of regular use or if padding becomes visibly compressed, cracked, or delaminated. Store in a dry location to prevent mold and mildew growth in the foam.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

Cotton-polyester blends in sports apparel may use formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance or sizing. No specific testing of MacGregor chest protectors is publicly available, but new garments in this category may off-gas formaldehyde. First wash and air drying before use mitigates exposure.

Reported

Foam degradation and particle shedding

Polyethylene and EVA foams degrade under mechanical stress and UV exposure, potentially releasing microparticles during wear and washing. While not acutely toxic, inhalation or skin contact with shed particles is a minor concern in repeated use, especially during active umpiring in hot conditions.

Possible

Azo dyes in outer shell coloring

Dark-colored cotton-poly blends may use azo dyes, which can release aromatic amines under sweat exposure or laundering. MacGregor does not specify dye chemistry; the risk is low but unverified. Prewashing before first use reduces exposure.

Possible

Antimony in polyester component

Polyester fibers may contain antimony as a catalyst from manufacturing. Levels in apparel are typically well below health thresholds, but polyester-dominant blends carry a minor theoretical risk, especially if the outer shell is high-polyester content.

Possible

Adhesive off-gassing between foam and fabric layers

The foam-to-shell bond likely uses polyurethane or rubber-based adhesives, which can emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during curing and early use. Odor typically dissipates within days of opening; ventilation and pre-use airing minimize exposure.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More sports equipment padding grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.