75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Clinique Moisture Surge Intense 72H Lipid-Replenishing Hydrator

Clinique · Moisturizer

Clinique Moisture Surge Intense 72H Lipid-Replenishing Hydrator

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern; typical moisturizer with no waterproofing or water-repellent coating triggers, but no brand transparency.

Verdict: BuyWater-based moisturizer with no established safety red flags; low PFAS concern typical of non-waterproof formulas; brand has standard cosmetic compliance record.

Clinique Moisture Surge is a standard leave-on facial moisturizer without water-repellent, stain-resistant, or nonstick treatments, the common vectors for PFAS in cosmetics. The brand does not disclose PFAS avoidance or testing. No independent lab data or third-party certification is publicly available.

Shop Clinique on Amazon →

Material

Water-based emulsion, glycerin, squalane, humectants

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a water-based emulsion stabilized with glycerin (humectant that draws moisture into skin) and squalane (lightweight plant-derived oil that mimics skin lipids). The formula contains no known sensitizing preservative systems flagged in recent safety databases, and the absence of waterproofing agents or silicone polymers eliminates several PFAS entry points common in other skincare. The lipid-replenishing claim relies on squalane and other occlusive ingredients, not problematic waxes or synthetic polymers.

The brand's record and disclosure

Clinique (Estee Lauder subsidiary) maintains FDA and standard cosmetic compliance and publishes ingredient lists; no recalls or major safety controversies on record for this product line. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS test results or removal commitments, which is typical of large cosmetics houses but reflects limited transparency. Third-party safety certifications (e.g., EWG Verify) are absent, though this is common for prestige moisturizers and not a violation.

How it compares in its category

Intensive moisturizers in this price tier often contain silicone-heavy or synthetic polymer bases that can build up on skin; Clinique's glycerin and squalane approach is simpler and closer to 'clean' alternatives. The 72-hour claim relies on occlusion rather than active ingredients, placing it squarely in the hydration-via-barrier category alongside products like CeraVe or La Roche-Posay, though with fewer published clinical trials. No major safety advantage or disadvantage versus comparable prestige brands.

If you buy it

Apply to damp skin to maximize humectant benefit; avoid eye area unless directed. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight; emulsions degrade faster when exposed to heat or light, risking separation and reduced efficacy (not toxicity, but product failure). If you experience redness or burning, discontinue; squalane is well-tolerated but individual fragrance/preservative sensitivity is possible. Replace every 12 months or if the texture separates visibly.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens

Product lists 'fragrance' as an ingredient without disclosing components; common allergens in moisturizer fragrances include geraniol and limonene. Individual sensitivity varies widely; patch testing is prudent if you have a history of fragrance reactions.

None known

Formaldehyde releasers

No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) are listed on the public ingredient deck. Clinique's standard preservative systems are compatible with formulation but not publicly disclosed in detail.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments

This moisturizer is tinted or colorless with no pigment claims; heavy metal contamination of cosmetic colorants is not a documented issue for major brands like Estee Lauder subsidiaries in prestige skincare.

Possible

1,4-dioxane (formulation byproduct)

Water-based emulsions may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of ethoxylated stabilizers, though not as an intentional ingredient. Published FDA data shows most cosmetics are below 10 ppm; Clinique does not disclose 1,4-dioxane testing results publicly.

Possible

Emulsion instability and microorganism growth

Water-based formulas rely on preservatives to prevent bacterial or mold growth; once opened, exposure to air and water contamination can compromise efficacy. Proper closure and storage are essential; if stored in a humid bathroom or left unsealed, shelf life is shortened.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Moisturizer

Tatcha Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin

Tatcha

Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin

Water-based cosmetic creams and serums; glass/plastic packaging

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern for a cosmetic moisturizer set, but Tatcha makes no public PFAS commitment.

Risky category by default

Herbivore Botanicals Orchid Facial Oil

Herbivore Botanicals

Orchid Facial Oil

plant oils, botanical extracts, glass bottle

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; facial oil with no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no transparency.

Risky category by default

Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil

Herbivore Botanicals

Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil

plant oils, mineral pigments, glass bottle

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower concern for PFAS; facial oil in glass, typical formulation poses minimal risk.

Risky category by default

More moisturizer grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.